Why do neutron stars have magnetic fields

AI Thread Summary
Neutron stars possess magnetic fields despite being electrically neutral due to the magnetic moments of their constituent quarks, which have electric charges. The alignment of these magnetic fields in neutron stars is a key question, as the individual fields in ordinary matter, like air, typically cancel each other out. The discussion raises the possibility that the unique conditions within neutron stars may lead to the alignment of these fields, contributing to their strong magnetic properties. The article by W Tucker and K Tucker at NASA provides foundational insights into this phenomenon. Understanding the origins and behavior of magnetic fields in neutron stars remains a complex and intriguing area of astrophysics.
Rodney
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
An article by W Tucker and K Tucker at NASA says that neutron stars have magnetic fields. If a magnetic field is created by moving charges, and neutron stars have not net charges to move, how are the fields created?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Actually the neutron itself has a magnetic moment, in spite of being an uncharged particle. The answer is that the quarks that make it up have electric charges. These charges cancel out over all to make the total charge zero, but the neutron still has these individual charges moving around inside it.
 
So, then wouldn't air currents for example, cause magnitism? Since the molecules are made up of atoms, which have quarks.
 
ArmoSkater87 said:
So, then wouldn't air currents for example, cause magnitism? Since the molecules are made up of atoms, which have quarks.
Since the feidls of the netrons in the molecules are not aligned, they end up canceling each other out. Which raises a question - why are those fields aligned in a neutron star? Or is it that they are not, but the magnetic field comes from some other feature of a neutron star?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top