Why do Oxygenated fuels contain less energy than hydrocarbons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CurryBoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Oxygenated fuels contain less energy than hydrocarbons primarily due to the difference in bond strength. Hydrocarbons have strong carbon-carbon bonds, making them more energy-dense, while oxygenated fuels have weaker bonds due to the presence of oxygen. The combustion of hydrocarbons results in more energy release compared to oxygenated fuels. Understanding combustion reactions and the role of redox processes is essential for grasping energy release in these reactions. Overall, the bond strength and composition of the fuels significantly influence their energy content.
CurryBoy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why do Oxygenated fuels contain less energy than hydrocarbons?
So my science teacher asked us this question and i have no clue what the answer is. We used a calorimeter to test the amount of energy in ethanol and octane, and the octane had more energy. Could anyone answer the question above? I would appreciate all the help i can get, thanks :)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Okay after doing some more research, I am guessing it has to do with the bonds in each fuel. Since hydrocarbons contain mostly carbon-carbon bonds, which are one of the strongest, they are very durable and hard to break. Unlike oxygenated fuels which are mixed with oxygen and have weaker bonds. Thus, the hydrocarbons are stronger due to the stronger bonds. Is that right? and does it make sense?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is a very good question to ask students because it tests whether they understand combustion reactions. Here are a few things to think about as you answer:

1) In the combustion of hydrocarbons (oxygenated or not), what are the products and reactants?

2) A combustion reaction is a redox reaction. Which chemical species are being oxidized and which species are being reduced?

3) In redox reactions, what factors determine how much energy gets released by the reaction?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top