Why Do Physical Processes Favor Entropy Maximization Over Energy Minimization?

AI Thread Summary
Physical processes are governed by the second law of thermodynamics, which states that they favor entropy maximization rather than energy minimization. Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG) is crucial for determining the direction of a process, as it accounts for both enthalpy and entropy changes. The dependence of ΔG on temperature indicates that higher temperatures can facilitate the progression of processes, even those that are non-spontaneous. There is a debate regarding protein folding and entropy; while some sources suggest that folding increases entropy, others argue that it decreases due to the formation of fixed structures. Understanding the relationship between enthalpy and free energy is essential for comprehending biochemical systems.
mather
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hello!

there is no law that says that processes occur physically towards the energy minimization of the system

however, there is a law (second thermodynamic) that says that processes occur physically towards the entropy maximization

1) so, why do we need ΔG (Gibbs free energy) to predetermine a process' direction?

2) also, why ΔG is depended to temperature?

3) I have seen in a tutorial where they said that moving from primary to secondary and to tertiary etc, protein structure, it is a increases in protein's entropy! in a textbook, I read the opposite (which is more correct imo, since a folded protein has some fixed substructures, thus the number of possible structures is limited)
which is the correct? and if folding decreases its entropy, how is this thermodynamically compliant?

4) what is the difference of enthalpy and free energy of a biochemical system?

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Gibbs Free Energy is a thermodynamic potential which determines the non-PV work or "useful" work in initiating and proceeding a process.

2.) Check the formula for Gibbs Free Energy. Usually, at higher temperatures, processes proceed more easily, even the non-spontaneous, difficult to get products can be formed.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top