MHB Why Do Physics Equations Confuse Me So Much?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion experienced by a user regarding physics equations, particularly those related to motion and velocity. The first question involves a formula for calculating distance traveled by an accelerating car, with participants providing guidance on transposing the equation and solving for velocity. The second question pertains to determining the travel time of an ordinary train based on the express train's travel time, with users clarifying the relationship between the two. Despite receiving assistance, the original poster continues to struggle with understanding the concepts and seeks further clarification. The conversation highlights the challenges many face when grappling with physics equations and the importance of clear explanations.
lmae
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
My brain feels like goop after reading these. I am struggling big time! Help is greatly appreciated.

Q1: The formula s=(u+v)/2t works out the distance traveled by an accelerating car (s), where u is the inital velocity, v is the final velocity and t is the time interval.
a) Transpose the formula, solving for v.
b) Find the velocity, v (metres/second, m/s) when s=400m, t=20s and u=30m.

Q2:An express train takes 5 1/2 hours to travel between two cities. If the express train takes only 3/5 of the time an ordinary train takes, how long will it take for the ordinary train to travel between the two towns?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lmae said:
My brain feels like goop after reading these. I am struggling big time! Help is greatly appreciated.

Q1: The formula s=(u+v)/2t works out the distance traveled by an accelerating car (s), where u is the inital velocity, v is the final velocity and t is the time interval.
a) Transpose the formula, solving for v.
b) Find the velocity, v (metres/second, m/s) when s=400m, t=20s and u=30m.

Q2:An express train takes 5 1/2 hours to travel between two cities. If the express train takes only 3/5 of the time an ordinary train takes, how long will it take for the ordinary train to travel between the two towns?

Hello Imae :).

1a)

$$s = \frac{u+v}{2t}$$

Let's multiply both sides by $2t$, this gives,

$$s*2t = \frac{u+v}{2t} * 2t$$.

We can see that the 2t terms on the right hand side (RHS) will cancel giving us,

$$2ts = u + v$$

Subtracting u from both sides,$$2ts - u = u + v - u$$

$$2ts - u = v$$

Remember, whatever we do to one side, we must do to the other side. And in all of the above steps, we are working towards have v as our subject (in other words, we want the expression to be of the form 'v = something').

I have to go now, but hopefully this can get you started.
 
The formula s=(u+v)/2t works out the distance traveled by an accelerating car (s), where u is the inital velocity, v is the final velocity and t is the time interval.

Joppy did this problem assuming you meant [math]s= \frac{u+ v}{2t}[/math]. In fact, from physics, the correct formula is [math]s= \frac{u+ v}{2} t[/math]. That is a much simpler problem. To solve the equation v= At for t, divide both sides by A: t= v/A. In this case, [math]A= \frac{u+ v}{2}[/math]

Q2:An express train takes 5 1/2 hours to travel between two cities. If the express train takes only 3/5 of the time an ordinary train takes, how long will it take for the ordinary train to travel between the two towns?

Let "A" be the time for an express train, "B" the time for an ordinary train. If "the express train takes only 3/5 of the time an ordinary train takes" then E= (3/5)O and, dividing both sides by 3/5, O= (5/3)E. What is 5/3 of 5 1/2 hours?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Joppy did this problem assuming you meant [math]s= \frac{u+ v}{2t}[/math]. [/math]

Ha! Whoops. I thought something seemed strange there, it's been awhile since I've dealt with these expressions. Thanks HallsofIvy, and apologies to the OP if any confusion was caused :).
 
Blast! I started off saying "Let "A" be the time for an express train, "B" the time for an ordinary train." but then switched to "E" and "O"!

I meant to say: If "the express train takes only 3/5 of the time an ordinary train takes" then A= (3/5)B and, dividing both sides by 3/5, B= (5/3)A. What is 5/3 of 5 1/2 hours?
 
Thanks for all your help guys. Got the train equation down pat. Not sure how I didn't understand that in the first place. Still have no idea what I am doing with question 1. (Not your fault Joppy, just really suck at maths) haha. How would I go about setting that question out? I find when I see the answer in front of me it is easy to find how we got to that solution but still struggle when it is looming around unanswered. I have given it another go and spoken to a lecturer who politely told me I was wrong in my final answer..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top