Why Do Planets Rotate on Their Axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caesar_Rahil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Rotating
AI Thread Summary
Planets rotate on their axis due to the angular momentum inherited from the original particles that formed them, which were not all directed toward the center. As these particles fell into decaying orbits around a common center of gravity, the imbalance in their directional movement contributed to the planets' rotation. The rotation of the original accretion disk may also have influenced the dominant direction of rotation, similar to the Coriolis effect. Despite initial assumptions that planets should rotate clockwise due to varying speeds of particles, the dynamics of particle movement toward the center of mass lead to a counterclockwise rotation. This understanding highlights the complex interplay of forces during planetary formation.
Caesar_Rahil
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I know why planets revolve around the sun. But why do they rotate on their axis?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Pretty much the same reason; the original particles that "fell together" to initially form the planet were not all heading directly for the center (in fact, is likely that virtually none of them were). So, rather than colliding perfectly head-on and coming to a stop, they all fell into decaying orbits around a common center of gravity. The number of particles orbiting in one direction was greater than the number orbiting the other direction, and this imported and inherent trait of angular momentum to the overall system.

Now, this next bit I'm not entirely certain about, but I imagine the rotation of the original accretion disk from which the planets formed contributed an influence rather like the Coriolis effect to determine which direction of rotation would dominate. That is just supposition on my part.

At any rate, because they flowed in a very low-friction environment, resulting planets just keep spending until something stops them.
 
I've wondered about this too. If you look down at the solar system from the north, the planets go around the sun in a CCW direction and most planets, such as Earth, rotate in a CCW direction from that view.

But, it seems that when the planets accreted, material inside the orbit is going faster and outside the orbit is going slower, so as the particles are collected, the planets should rotate CW instead (it helps to draw a picture).
 
Is that does seem a little perplexing at first. However, rather than making a picture, I think it might help more to imagine a video of a planet coalescing from the accretion disk. If you draw a line describing the eventual orbit of the finished planet (where the center of mass will be), you can see that particles moving toward that line from the center of the solar system are slowing down as they moved higher orbit, while particles falling into that line from further outside are speeding up as they falling to lower orbit. I think it is this that causes the planets' tendency to rotate in the same direction as they orbit.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top