Why Do Significant Digits Include Uncertain Numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The number 3568 +/- 42 has two significant digits because the uncertainty affects the hundreds place, making it significant despite being uncertain. Significant digits include all certain digits and one uncertain digit, which is crucial for understanding precision in measurements. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between certain and uncertain digits when determining significant figures. Writing in scientific notation can clarify the representation of significant digits, but it can also lead to confusion if not applied correctly. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate communication of numerical data.
Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



How many significant digits does the number 3568 +/- 42 have?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The true value is ranging between 3526 and 3610. Why is there two significant digits and not one? I can't even find a specific definition of significant digits anywhere, just random examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss M.D. said:
The true value is ranging between 3526 and 3610. Why is there two significant digits and not one? I can't even find a specific definition of significant digits anywhere, just random examples.

It's about the places of error, here the error doesn't exist in the thousand's place. Hundred's place is uncertain in spite of the fact that it is significant!
I hope this helps!

Edit: It always helps to write in scientific notation...usually after rounding off its written as:

##(357±4)\times10=(3.57±0.04)\times10^3##

You are mixing up "certain and uncertain digits" with "significant digits"!...Significant digits include all certain digits and one uncertain digit!...Here digit "3" is certain whereas digit "5", "6", "8" are uncertain in 3568 as you already mentioned due to comparatively large error.

Even scientific notation can mislead you if you aren't careful!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top