Why do the spokes on a wagon seam to rotate backwards at certin speeds?

  • Thread starter Andrew Buren
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rotate
In summary: Older films were shot on film and the shutter was a physical shutter that moved in front of the film in a wheel. As it rotated, it exposed the top of the film first and then the next slice below it and finally the bottom. So between the time when the top of the wheel was photographed and the bottom the car had moved forward and so the wheel looked like it was stretch backward at the top and forward at the bottom.
  • #1
Andrew Buren
18
0
This is another thing that I have trouble figuring out. Why do the spokes on a wagon seam to rotate backwards at certin speeds?
Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you ever seen this? I have not. I have seen film of this, but that's a different question.
 
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
Have you ever seen this? I have not. I have seen film of this, but that's a different question.

You can also see it (same reason - different medium) under fluorescent lights. Long, long ago when Hi-Fi enthusiasts worried about turntable speeds, there were poor-man's strobes that looked something like an optical encoder disk that you could put on the turntable and view under a fluorescent light. Depending on the speed, it went forwards, stood still, or went backwards.

Now, how you get your Conestoga wagon under a fluorescent light is another question.:smile:
 
  • #4
TVP45 said:
Long ago when Hi-Fi enthusiasts worried about turntable speeds, there were poor-man's strobes that looked something like an optical encoder disk that you could put on the turntable and view under a fluorescent light. Depending on the speed, it went forwards, stood still, or went backwards.
Later and current turntables have a built in strobe and the speed pattern on the side of the turntable.

One similar effect I've seen in outside in sunlight is an apparent strobe pattern effect from viewing the wheel nuts on a large track at a near parallel to wheel angle (as a passenger with a truck to the passenger side of the viewing car). Although the spacing between nuts is large, I'm guessing the effect is similar to a Zoetrope.
 
  • #5
TVP45 said:
Now, how you get your Conestoga wagon under a fluorescent light is another.

The 19th century version of Pimp My Ride?
 
  • #6
The set they use for "Antiques Roadshow" on PBS looks pretty big. As a bonus, you find out how much your wagon is worth. :biggrin:
 
  • #7
The way it was explained to me goes something like this...

First of all you have to realize that your eyes are NOT a constant picture feed, but instead they receive still pictures at regular intervals. These intervals are very short and in effect your brain interprets these series of pics as motion like we see it; sort of like how old film is done or how motion flip books work.

What happens in order to see this effect your talking about is your eyes take the individual shots at regular intervals but because the wheel or propellor is accelerating at some point the pictures overlap and the reversing effect is observed.
 
  • #8
There's a similar effect giving the stretched wheels on racing cars in early movies.
The shutter in early film cameras is a slit in a wheel that rotates in front of the film.
As it turns it exposes the top of the image first and then the next slice below it and finally the bottom.
So between the time when the top of the wheel is photographed and the bottom the car has moved forward and so the wheel looks like it is stretch backward at the top and forward at the bottom.

Cartoons draw this effect exaggerated to make the car look fast, but usually draw the wheel forward at the top.

ps. You can show the 'frame rate' of your eye in a dark room by swinging a flashlight or laser pointer at arms length. You will see a series of lights rather than a continuous blur.
Depending on the lighting etc your eye runs at around 15fps.
 
  • #9
mgb_phys said:
There's a similar effect giving the stretched wheels on racing cars in early movies.
The shutter in early film cameras is a slit in a wheel that rotates in front of the film.
As it turns it exposes the top of the image first and then the next slice below it and finally the bottom.
So between the time when the top of the wheel is photographed and the bottom the car has moved forward and so the wheel looks like it is stretch backward at the top and forward at the bottom.

Cartoons draw this effect exaggerated to make the car look fast, but usually draw the wheel forward at the top.

ps. You can show the 'frame rate' of your eye in a dark room by swinging a flashlight or laser pointer at arms length. You will see a series of lights rather than a continuous blur.
Depending on the lighting etc your eye runs at around 15fps.

I don't think this is correct. Studies of air force pilots have shown that the human eye can detect changes in light/dark as short as 2 ms (500 fps) and changes in motion as fast as 3-4 ms. The effect of seeing a strobe instead of a blur of a bright object in a dark room is due to how the brain interprets high contrast motion.
 
  • #10
When I said 'eyes' - I should have really said "eye+retina+optic nerve+visual cortex"
Vision is very complex and what you see depends on a lot of factors - where in your field of view, what contrast, how bright etc.

The important point is that your eye isn't a continuous system or a digital frame system - it's both/neither.
 
  • #11
Coming from an animation and design perspective, I have always gone off the assumption that the eye cannot detect changes at 24 fps. Any flash animation you see out there is usually running at this speed.

As to the spokes on a wagon. Quite frankly I have never seen a real-life wagon wheel to comment on that particular instance, but you can notice this effect everyday by watching the hubcaps (er, I'm not sure if that's an Australian term or not, but 'rims' would be an equivalent I think) on most cars. Especially in car ads.

It is a tricky subject though, because yes the eye only captures so much image at a designated frame rate - but it is also how your own individual brain interprets each of those images. It is like any optical illusion whereas some people will always see the wheel spinning backwards, others will not, and some can choose to see it going backwards and forwards (me being one of them). There is a great illusion out there, of a model standing on one leg - with the other raised in front of it. The model is spinning in circles on the spot. (Supposedly) depending on what side of the brain you use means you will either see the model spinning clockwise, or see it spinning anti-clockwise, or you will be able to see it going both ways and change direction.

Here she is:

http://www.joselise.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Spinning_Lady.gif

And I would assume that the spokes of your wagon would work on the same principles of this illusion:

http://illusion.kitt.net/uploaded_images/wheel-725532.gif"

Click on the image if it doesn't load - it will take you to a working version. The website might not allow external linking of images.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I love the dancer illusion, try staring at it and relax-let your eyes go to infinity
when you focus again you can get it to switch directions.
 
  • #13
Imagine that the wheel has a bright red spot somewhere along the edge. Imagine the spot being right at the top of the spinning wheel.

Now, your eyes take 'samples' of the spinning wheel, and those samples are shown to your brain at a rapid succession so it looks like it is just a continuous stream of information.

Now, in 'sample 0' the red spot is at the top of the wheel.
If the time between two samples is arbitrary, the red spot will appear in a very different location in the next sample. And another different location in the next, etc, so it will appear as a blurry red line instead of a red spot.

Now imagine that the time between two simples is just right, so that in the first sample 'sample 0' the red spot is at the top. In the next sample, 'sample 1' the spot has rotated nearly one revolution and ended up just before the position of the red spot in sample 0. Then, in the next sample, sample 2, the spot is just before the position of the spot in sample 1, etc. This way, the spot seems to be moving backwards very slowly!

EDIT
Cooked up an image to clarify:
2mwe4pt.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #14
mgb_phys said:
I love the dancer illusion, try staring at it and relax-let your eyes go to infinity
when you focus again you can get it to switch directions.

It's easier if you scroll the page down so that you can only see her shadow. Focus on the shadow for a minute. Because it is not fully into view, it can be 'made' to change direction much easier! Once you got the shadow to change direction, scroll back up and the dancer should follow. Pretty amazing illusion I agree!
 
  • #15
The dancer illusion is awesome!
I am able to switch directions as well as have it appear to go back and forth.

I heard it said here that it's a left/right brain thing.
What I wonder is if it's healthy to do this. Maybe it would be a great tool for brain strengthening, or maybe it would fry what few brain cells i have left.

Anyone know?
 
  • #16
pallidin said:
The dancer illusion is awesome!
I am able to switch directions as well as have it appear to go back and forth.

I heard it said here that it's a left/right brain thing.
What I wonder is if it's healthy to do this. Maybe it would be a great tool for brain strengthening, or maybe it would fry what few brain cells i have left.

Anyone know?

Someone who is autistic can't sense optical illusions generally, why do you think that might be?
 
  • #17
I can only see that dancer spinning clockwise. I've tried everything to make it look like she's spinning counter-clockwise and I just can't seem to do it.
 
  • #18
leroyjenkens said:
I can only see that dancer spinning clockwise. I've tried everything to make it look like she's spinning counter-clockwise and I just can't seem to do it.
Scroll the picture up until you can just see the dancers foot or just focus on the dancers foot. Without the front + back information it's easier to see imagine the dancer turning the other way. Once you get the foot to appear to be spinning counter clockwise, scroll the picture down slowly or stop looking at just the foot. The dancer will appear to be spinning towards her right if you imagine she is standing on her left leg, and vice versa. Once the model appears to be spinning in a particular direction, my brain "expects" the motion to continue so it's difficult for me to mentally change the direction unless I look away for a brief moment, because to change direction, the dancer has to instantly change which foot she's standing on (and instantly change angular momentum). If I focus on the foot, I can imaging the image changing direction back and forth by imagining either the heel or the toes are always pointed towards me or to the side.

mgb_phys said:
You can show the 'frame rate' of your eye in a dark room by swinging a flashlight or laser pointer at arms length. You will see a series of lights rather than a continuous blur.
I see streaks (so do most people), not a series of lights, unless the light source is pulsing.

Getting back to the OP, is it possible that the view was a side view and the viewer was looking at the spokes of one wheel through the spokes of another, which would create an interference pattern?
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Because your eyes are broken.

Nah it's all to do with frame rate. The eye does all sorts of weird things to try to make sense of the world. Has anyone sat on a train and felt like they were moving while another train moved off, only to realize it was them that was moving only. That feels pretty strange.
 
  • #20
The Dagda said:
Someone who is autistic can't sense optical illusions generally, why do you think that might be?

Good point.
Dagda, I recall a specific illusion involving optically switching left/right viewing by a headset mirror arrangement.
This causes, say, bumps in a road to appear as depressions, and holes to appears as "bumps"; among other odd visual consequences.
What disturbed me is that I read continued use could result in a lasting(though not permanent) reversal after using the headset.

These levels of illusions are very powerful.
Similarly, as mentioned before, I wonder if actively practicing left/right brain switching is a good thing, or not.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
pallidin said:
Good point.
Dagda, I recall a specific illusion involving optically switching left/right viewing by a headset mirror arrangement.
This causes, say, bumps in a road to appear as depressions, and holes to appears as "bumps"; among other odd visual consequences.
What disturbed me is that I read continued use could result in a lasting(though not permanent) reversal after using the headset.

These levels of illusions are very powerful.
Similarly, as mentioned before, I wonder if actively practicing left/right brain switching is a good thing, or not.

Apparently that's why autistics can't see them. They don't filter anything right or left brain, that's why they are sometimes savants.

This ones good, try playing around with paint and remove the square.

optical%20illusion.jpg
 
  • #22
leroyjenkens said:
I can only see that dancer spinning clockwise. I've tried everything to make it look like she's spinning counter-clockwise and I just can't seem to do it.

Leroy
Try this. Watch the dancer and shake your head back and forth briskly like as if to say no. Depending on how fast you oscillate back and forth the dancer will slow down, speed up, stop, and for you reverse.
 
  • #24
robphy said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon-wheel_effect

(Strobe light water droplets)


That wikipedia article is amazingly comprehensive for such an obscure subject.

The evidence, then, is pretty much contrary to the notion that we sample our visual field at any rate that could cause this. I've never seen it outside of obvious strobe conditions and motion pictures.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. Why do the spokes on a wagon seem to rotate backwards at certain speeds?

The phenomenon of the spokes on a wagon appearing to rotate backwards is known as the "wagon-wheel effect." It occurs when the frequency of the rotation of the wheel is similar to the frequency of the camera's frame rate. This creates an optical illusion where the spokes appear to be moving in the opposite direction of the wheel's rotation.

2. How does the frequency of the camera's frame rate affect the wagon-wheel effect?

The frequency of the camera's frame rate is directly related to the perception of the wagon-wheel effect. If the frame rate is too low, the illusion will not occur. However, if the frame rate is close to the frequency of the wheel's rotation, the effect will be more pronounced.

3. Can the wagon-wheel effect also be seen in other moving objects?

Yes, the wagon-wheel effect can also be seen in other moving objects such as car wheels or helicopter blades. As long as the frequency of the object's rotation is similar to the frame rate of the camera, the illusion will occur.

4. Is the wagon-wheel effect a real phenomenon or just an optical illusion?

The wagon-wheel effect is a real phenomenon that is caused by the way our brain interprets visual information. While it may seem like the spokes are actually moving backwards, they are in fact moving in the same direction as the wheel's rotation.

5. Can the wagon-wheel effect be prevented or eliminated?

The wagon-wheel effect can be reduced or eliminated by adjusting the frame rate of the camera or by using a different type of camera with a higher frame rate. It can also be prevented by using a strobe light to "freeze" the motion of the wheel, making it appear as though the spokes are not moving at all.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
889
Replies
18
Views
969
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
133
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
349
  • General Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
2K
Back
Top