Why Do Thermometers Show the Same Reading in Ethanol and Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BudsPro+
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why mercury thermometers show the same reading in both ethanol and water at 50°C, despite their differing heat capacities. It is established that when two substances reach thermal equilibrium, they will have the same temperature, which explains the identical readings. The confusion arises from the assumption that the final temperature should vary based on the heat capacity of the substances involved. However, the small mass of mercury in the thermometer means that its temperature change is negligible compared to the larger bodies of liquid, leading to similar readings. Ultimately, while the thermometer reflects the true temperature of the liquids after equilibrium, it does not represent the temperature of the liquids before the thermometer's introduction.
BudsPro+
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Material X,which is at a higher temperature, and Mercury are brought into contact for some time to allow heat transfer to take place.


CX : Heat capacity of Material X
θX : Temperature of Material X (At first)
CM : Heat capacity of Mercury
θM : Temperature of Mercury (At first)

θX is greater than θM. [ θX > θM ]
So heat energy is transferred from Material X to Mercury.
θN : Final temperature of both Material X and Mercury after heat transfer is complete. [ At thermal equilibrium. ]

Assumption: There is no heat loss to surroundings.

Homework Equations



Heat gained by mercury = Heat lost by Material X
δQM = - δQX
CMδθM = - CXδθX
CMN – θM) = - CXN – θX)
θNCM – θMCM = θXCX - θNCX
θNCM + θNCX = θXCX + θMCM

θN = [ θXCX + θMCM ] / [ CX + CM ]




The Attempt at a Solution


Therefore if we take X to be of different materials or even of different masses, the final temperature of the mercury , θN , should vary because the heat capacity of X , CX , changes. However this is not the case as if, for example, we place 2 mercury-in-glass thermometers in Ethanol at 50oC and Water at 50oC, both thermometers show a reading of 50oC.
Note: The Ethanol and the Water have different heat capacities.

I would like to see what you think about this problem. I really cannot understand, according to the above formula, why the thermometers show the same reading for the Ethanol and the Water. Any 2 other substances could have been taken but Ethanol and Water are simpler. Could someone please give me a good explanation about this?

 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
BudsPro+ said:
Therefore if we take X to be of different materials or even of different masses, the final temperature of the mercury , θN , should vary because the heat capacity of X , CX , changes.
Yes, the final temperature will depend on the mass and heat capacity of the substance.
However this is not the case as if, for example, we place 2 mercury-in-glass thermometers in Ethanol at 50oC and Water at 50oC, both thermometers show a reading of 50oC.
I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Can you restate it?

Regardless of the heat capacities of the two substances, sooner or later they will reach thermal equilibrium which means they have the same temperature. That final will be different for different substances, of course.
 
what I mean is that if for example, we take mercury(20 degrees celcius, in fact room temperature) & in contact with water(50 degreees celcius) and on the other side we take the same mercury at room temperature but in contact with Ethanol at 50 degrees celcius, the final temperature reached in the 2 cases will be different. So why do the 2 thermometers(which contain mercury at 20 degrees celsius), placed in separate beakers of Water at 50 degrees and Ethanol at 50 degrees, show the same reading of 50 degrees celcius. The reading should have been different. Don't you think so?
 
BudsPro+ said:
So why do the 2 thermometers(which contain mercury at 20 degrees celsius), placed in separate beakers of Water at 50 degrees and Ethanol at 50 degrees, show the same reading of 50 degrees celcius. The reading should have been different. Don't you think so?
Ah... now I see what you're saying. Technically, you are correct. But assume that the amount of mercury is small enough that the amount of heat needed to increase the thermometer's temperature is too small to make a measurable difference in the final temperature of the substance in the beaker.
 
Yeahh thx. I have tried it and it works for small masses of mercury though there is still a little difference in the reading ( of about 0.5 degrees celcius). So would you agree if I say that the temperature reading given by a liquid-in-glass thermometer is not the true temperature of the body being measured ?
 
BudsPro+ said:
So would you agree if I say that the temperature reading given by a liquid-in-glass thermometer is not the true temperature of the body being measured ?
Once they have reached thermal equilibrium, the measured temperature will be the 'true' temperature of the body. But it won't necessarily be the temperature of the body before the thermometer was introduced.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top