Why do these terms vanish in this solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rokyen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
rokyen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was given this problem as homework and managed to find the solution online, but I don't fully understand it.

ANoeS.jpg


My only question, and the reason I was getting this problem wrong, is because I wasn't realizing that the functions evaluated from -∞ to +∞ were vanishing. Is this a concept from calculus I'm not understanding or is this related somehow to a QM postulate or something?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That condition is just a physicality condition on f. f is a wave function so the physical interpretation of this is that any wave function or derivatives of wave functions must vanish or be zero at infinity. Its kind of like an electric field due to a charge source being zero really far away from the charge source. Its a simplifying assumption.
 


Ah, thanks.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top