Why Do We Divide Both Sides in Formula Transposition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wewelsburg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of formula transposition, highlighting common challenges and misunderstandings. In the first example, the confusion arises from the multiplication by two to eliminate the 1/2 factor, not a division. The second example is clarified, emphasizing that terms can be rearranged without unnecessary factors, and the correct application of algebraic principles is essential. Participants also address misconceptions about how terms interact across the equation, particularly regarding the cancellation of terms when multiplying or dividing. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of understanding algebraic manipulations to successfully transpose formulas.
wewelsburg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
formula transposition is basic but I have trouble in doing it sometimes. eg1 is the correct answer but why do we divide both sides by two??
Also I think I got eg2 wrong, my sense of multiplication and division is off.

S=UT+1/2at^2 make a the subject
* Deduct UT from both sides S-UT=1/2AT^2
*multiply both sides by 2 2(S-UT)=AT^2
*Divide both sides by t^2 A=2(S-UT)/T^2

EG2
L=N^2 X UA/ 1 make N the subject of the formula.
*divide both sides by UA N^2/1=L/UA
*multiply 1 N^2=L/UA X 1
*square the equation N=square root of L/UA X 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wewelsburg said:
Hi,
formula transposition is basic but I have trouble in doing it sometimes. eg1 is the correct answer but why do we divide both sides by two??
I don't see any division by two-- you multiply both sides by two to eliminate the factor of 1/2 premultiplying a.
Also I think I got eg2 wrong, my sense of multiplication and division is off.
2. looks fine to me. However, you have factors of 1 floating around which really don't need to be written. So, I would do 2. as follows:
l=n^2ua
\frac{l}{ua}=n^2
n=\sqrt{\frac{l}{ua}}
 
Thanks Cristo.
 
Also, I have another transposed formulae with the right working and answer, but I've misunderstood some details.

Find Y
y/(y + x)+ 5=x
a) Multiply each side by y+x to get rid of the fraction
y+5(y+x)=xy+x^2
b) Multiply out of brackets
y+5y+5x=xy+x^2
c) Get all y terms on the left hand side of equation by subtracting xy
6y-xy+5x=x^2
d) Subtract 5x
6y-xy=x^2-5x
e) Divide 6-x to isolate y for final answer
y=x^2-5x/6-x

I don't understand step b) where we get a value of x^2. Because x(y+x) would give us x^2 + y, not another separate x value.
Also in all the tanspositions I have done so far if you use a figure on one side of the equation it cancels out on that sideof the equation (eg V=IR x R would cancel R out RHS) but in step a this doesn't happen. Is this because there are like characters on both sides of the equation (x and y)?
 
wewelsburg said:
Also, I have another transposed formulae with the right working and answer, but I've misunderstood some details.

Find Y
y/(y + x)+ 5=x
a) Multiply each side by y+x to get rid of the fraction
y+5(y+x)=xy+x^2
b) Multiply out of brackets
y+5y+5x=xy+x^2
c) Get all y terms on the left hand side of equation by subtracting xy
6y-xy+5x=x^2
d) Subtract 5x
6y-xy=x^2-5x
e) Divide 6-x to isolate y for final answer
y=x^2-5x/6-x

I don't understand step b) where we get a value of x^2. Because x(y+x) would give us x^2 + y, not another separate x value.
NO! x(y+ x)= x*y+ x*x= x^2+ xy, not x^2+ y.

Also in all the tanspositions I have done so far if you use a figure on one side of the equation it cancels out on that sideof the equation (eg V=IR x R would cancel R out RHS) but in step a this doesn't happen.
I don't understand what you mean by "use a figure on one side of the equation". If you want to solve V= IR for I, you must divide both sides of the equation by R: V/R= (IR)/R and now the two R's cancel:V/R= I.

Is this because there are like characters on both sides of the equation (x and y)?
It certainly did "happen". Multiplying both sides of the equation by x+ y "cancels" the denominator on the left: (y/y+x)(y+x)= y
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top