Why do we normalise a signal (function)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter janu203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Signal
AI Thread Summary
Normalizing a signal before feeding it to a compander is essential to prevent saturation and ensure adequate sensitivity for varying signal levels. Directly inputting an unnormalized signal can lead to clipping or a poor signal-to-noise ratio due to the compander's limited dynamic range. Additionally, when multiple sources are processed through the same compander, maintaining a consistent loudness level is crucial for optimal performance. The normalization process helps achieve this consistency and enhances overall audio quality. Proper signal normalization is vital for effective companding in audio processing.
janu203
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
http://www.seas.ucla.edu/dsplab/sqc/over.html
It says we have to normalize a signal before it is fed to a compander which reduces its dynamic range. But why don't we directly feed the compander block without normalizing the function first?

Help Required.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Because the compander might saturate with too much signal, or it may not have enough sensitivity (or enough significant digits) for too little signal.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and janu203
janu203 said:
http://www.seas.ucla.edu/dsplab/sqc/over.html
It says we have to normalize a signal before it is fed to a compander which reduces its dynamic range. But why don't we directly feed the compander block without normalizing the function first?

Help Required.
The channel, despite using companding, still has a given dynamic range so the input signal range needs to be appropriate if you want to avoid clipping or poor signal to noise ratio. Also, a number if sources could be passed through the same commander (say in a broadcast transmitter) so they need a reasonably constant loudness level.
[Edit: a lot of which @anorlunda has already said.]
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top