Why do we take the no. of years to compound the interest as power?

Juwane
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Why do we take the "no. of years to compound the interest" as power?

Suppose interest is given at 12% annually, compounded once a year. At the end of the year we will have (A = starting amount):

A( 1 + 0.12 )

But if it is compounded twice a year, then at the end of the year we will have:

2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)

Why is the above wrong? Why it should be A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)^2 instead of 2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Juwane said:
Suppose interest is given at 12% annually, compounded once a year. At the end of the year we will have (A = starting amount):

A( 1 + 0.12 )

But if it is compounded twice a year, then at the end of the year we will have:

2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)

Why is the above wrong? We it should be A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)^2 instead of 2A \left( 1 + \frac{0.12}{2} \right)?

The interest you earned for the first half year is now money upon which you earn more interest for the second half of the year. Take for example 20% interest on 100 dollars compounded twice a year. In the first half-year you earn 10% of $100 so you have $100+$10= $110.
For the second half-year you earn 10% on the $110 so you have $110 + $11 = $121.

That's what "compounded" means. You earn interest on the interest, and then interest on the interest on the interest, and so on.

It helps to forget "years" and work only with "periods". Say you earn interest per period at a rate of r_p. For a given period if you start with an amount A at the end of that period you have amount A + r_p A= A(1+r_p).

Do this for k periods and you have:
A=A_0(1+r_p)(1+r_p)\cdots(1+r_p) = A_0(1+r_p)^k

Understand that formula first. Each compounding period effects a multiplication by 1 plus the rate. Repeated multiplications are expressed by a power.

Now we rescale to years. Given an annual rate of r and n periods in a year and t years.
r_p = r/n
k = nt
so
A(t) =A_0\left(1+r_p\right)^k= A_0 \left(1 + \frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}

(with A_0 = P the initial amount is called the "principle" by accountants.)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top