Why Do We Use Light Signals to Measure Time?

crimsonidol
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
why do we use light signals to measure time?
In flat spacetime

Let's say we have two observers in one's rest frame the other one has velocity v. We suppose each of them sent light signals to other one with time separation of Δt(their proper time) and measure time accordingly.we see time dilation here. so far everything is ok for me.

But I think I'm missing something and I do not get that. Do we have to use light signals?

In the same situtation what if observers throw rocks with velocity w again with time separation Δt. Both should see the rocks thrown from other one with velocity w' with different signs.Shouldn't this method measure time dilation with same accuracy? if it can , can't we built this method to build coordinate lattices?

I assumed that we know Lorentz transformations and limiting speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We use clocks to measure time - though one can, in principle, define a "light clock" given a ruler, there's no special need to use this particular sort of clock - and in fact we usually use other sorts of clocks, atomic clocks being the most accurate.

We use light signals to synchronize clocks. We could use other means, but light signals are easy. If you're familiar with the limiting speed concept, you can see that we could use ultra-relativistic particle beams to synchronize clocks too, but why bother when we know they'll travel at the same speed as the more easily generated light beams.
 
i got the point.. I see it was a silly question .Thanks for the answer.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top