Why does 1/k + 1/(1-k) = 1/k(1-k)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quozzy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the algebraic identity 1/k + 1/(1-k) = 1/(k(1-k)). The original poster expresses confusion about manipulating these expressions but realizes the answer shortly after posting. They acknowledge a momentary lapse in basic arithmetic and apologize for the confusion. Other participants empathize, noting that similar moments of clarity often occur while explaining problems. The conversation highlights the common experience of struggling with math concepts, especially when tired.
quozzy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Okay, I feel stupid posting this, but algebraic manipulation is failing me. I know these two expressions are the same, but can anyone help me see how one could arrive at one of these from the other?

EDIT: *facepalm* Alright, I was trying to figure this out for a half hour before I posted. Of course, after posting I immediately came across the answer. I guess it was just a minor brainfart. Sorry guys, don't mind me...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you meant 1/(k(1-k)) on the right hand side.

I also assume you know how to compute with fractions, such as writing:
\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4}​
as a single fraction. So, can you explain why you are having trouble with the question you asked? Where are you stuck?


EDIT: *facepalm* Alright, I was trying to figure this out for a half hour before I posted. Of course, after posting I immediately came across the answer. I guess it was just a minor brainfart. Sorry guys, don't mind me...
Ah! Good then. Brainfarts happen all the time. You wouldn't believe how often I solve a problem in the process of trying to explain it to someone else as I'm asking for help!
 
Yeah, I realize now how silly this question really was. As I pointed out in my edit, for some reason I completely blanked out on basic arithmetic. I guess that's what happens when you're overdue for a good night's sleep...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top