Why does 1/k + 1/(1-k) = 1/k(1-k)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quozzy
  • Start date Start date
quozzy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Okay, I feel stupid posting this, but algebraic manipulation is failing me. I know these two expressions are the same, but can anyone help me see how one could arrive at one of these from the other?

EDIT: *facepalm* Alright, I was trying to figure this out for a half hour before I posted. Of course, after posting I immediately came across the answer. I guess it was just a minor brainfart. Sorry guys, don't mind me...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you meant 1/(k(1-k)) on the right hand side.

I also assume you know how to compute with fractions, such as writing:
\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4}​
as a single fraction. So, can you explain why you are having trouble with the question you asked? Where are you stuck?


EDIT: *facepalm* Alright, I was trying to figure this out for a half hour before I posted. Of course, after posting I immediately came across the answer. I guess it was just a minor brainfart. Sorry guys, don't mind me...
Ah! Good then. Brainfarts happen all the time. You wouldn't believe how often I solve a problem in the process of trying to explain it to someone else as I'm asking for help!
 
Yeah, I realize now how silly this question really was. As I pointed out in my edit, for some reason I completely blanked out on basic arithmetic. I guess that's what happens when you're overdue for a good night's sleep...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top