What is the Role of Gyroscopic Inertia in Bullet Spin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Red_CCF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Spin
AI Thread Summary
A bullet spins due to the rifling in the gun barrel, which creates a rotational motion that enhances stability through gyroscopic inertia. This spin allows the bullet to maintain a straight trajectory, counteracting the Magnus effect, which can cause drift due to external factors like wind. The rotational axis of a bullet remains stable in direction, but can shift due to gravitational forces. Unlike spherical projectiles, the spin aligns with the bullet's velocity vector, significantly improving accuracy. Overall, gyroscopic inertia plays a crucial role in maintaining the bullet's trajectory despite external influences.
Red_CCF
Messages
530
Reaction score
0
I was wondering why a bullet spins. From what I read a spinning bullet shoots straighter, but I don't really understand why since the Magnus Effect would cause it to drift or does the gyroscopic inertia compensate for this?

Also, does gyroscopic inertia cause the rotational axis to be stable at a position in space or does the effect only maintain that the direction of the rotational axis doesn't change but can be shifted?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A spinning axis gives stability along the axis (gyroscpic inertia). It's a directionnal stability only. Regular inertia counters shifting.

But in which direction would the Magnus effect steer the bullet? Answer : neither because the spinning axis is along the trajectory (unlike to a baseball). There is no shifting except gravitationnal and wind.
 
Red_CCF said:
I was wondering why a bullet spins. From what I read a spinning bullet shoots straighter, but I don't really understand why since the Magnus Effect would cause it to drift or does the gyroscopic inertia compensate for this?

Also, does gyroscopic inertia cause the rotational axis to be stable at a position in space or does the effect only maintain that the direction of the rotational axis doesn't change but can be shifted?

Thanks.
A bullet spins because the gun barrel is designed to put spin on it. It has spiral grooves that dig into the surface of the bullet (lead or copper usually) and cause the bullet to rotate as it goes down the barrel.

A rotating bullet is more stable than a non-rotating one because it has angular momentum. In order to change angular momentum, a torque has to be applied to the bullet (torque = time rate of change of momentum so if no torque, angular momentum does not change).

AM
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
But in which direction would the Magnus effect steer the bullet? Answer : neither because the spinning axis is along the trajectory (unlike to a baseball). There is no shifting except gravitationnal and wind.

Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

They explain that due to cross winds the bullet will yawn and its nose (and axis of rotation) will yaw and end up pointing in a different direction than its direction of motion (so Magnus effect should occur?) so would the added gyroscopic inertia more than compensate for this effect?
 
Red_CCF said:
I was wondering why a bullet spins.
Thanks.

In the early days of musketry, the bullets were spherical and ejected from the barrel with random spin. The Magnus effect causes such balls to careen (curve) unpredictably. It was soon learned that by causing the spin to be along the velocity vector (by "rifling" the barrel), Magnus effects are reduced and accuracy is greatly improved. Later still bullets were "streamlined" or altered from spherical shapes, and the spin also keeps the noses of such streamlined slugs facing into the wind from barrel to point of impact.
 
Red_CCF said:
Here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

They explain that due to cross winds the bullet will yawn and its nose (and axis of rotation) will yaw and end up pointing in a different direction than its direction of motion (so Magnus effect should occur?) so would the added gyroscopic inertia more than compensate for this effect?

In that diagram, the ball is rolling end over end, like a baseball. Bullets spin around a horizontal axis, not a vertical axis.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top