A Why does a photon have a defined frequency but is also somewhat localized?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuasarBoy543298
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Photon
QuasarBoy543298
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
a photon have defined frequency , but we treat it as a localized particle ,how that can be?

if i am looking at second quantisation, photons are modes of the electromagnetic field , and they are not localized at all , but we do know that photons are somewhat localized , like in the photoelectric effect for example .

so,what am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
saar321412 said:
we treat it as a localized particle
This is incorrect. A photon has no position operator so it cannot be localized
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and vanhees71
saar321412 said:
a photon have defined frequency

Some "photon" states do, but others don't. More precisely, some states of the quantum electromagnetic field are eigenstates of the frequency operator, but others aren't.

saar321412 said:
photons are somewhat localized , like in the photoelectric effect for example

The photoelectric effect doesn't localize anything; there are no position measurements of anything involved. The measurements are of voltage and current.

The closest thing you will get to "localization of a photon" is in an experiment like a double slit with an extremely low intensity source, so you can see individual "photons" hitting the detector screen as dots, that build up an interference pattern over time. But even that can be interpreted as localization of the atom that absorbs the photon, not the photon itself.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby, Klystron, strangerep and 1 other person
PeterDonis said:
But even that can be interpreted as localization of the atom that absorbs the photon, not the photon itself.
I think that is key
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Indeed. First of all one should remember that in quantum theory an exact plane-wave state (i.e., momentum eigenstate) is a "generalized state" for free particles (i.e., not confined to a cavity of finite volume). A real state must be normalizable and thus only wave packets, i.e., with finite width in the momentum distribution are true states.

A photon is a one-quantum Fock state of the (asymptotic) free electromagnetic field. It is not localizable in a very fundamental sense. In contradistinction to massive quanta a photon, as the quantum of a massless spin-1- field, has not even a position observable in the strict sense.

That doesn't matter much, because all we can observe concerning the "localization of electromagnetic radiation" are intensities. For photons that's the probability distribution to detect them at the location determined by the detector. The physical mechanism on the microscopic level behind many usually used photon detectors is the photoelectric effect, and there the location of the corresponding atom/molecule from which the electron is emitted through interaction with the em. field determines the location of the corresponding "detection event".
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Dale
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top