Why Does a Positive Test Charge Slow Down Near Another Positive Charge?

AI Thread Summary
A positive test charge +q slows down as it approaches a fixed positive charge +Q due to changes in electric potential and electric potential energy (EPE). As the test charge gets closer to +Q, the electric potential increases, indicating that the potential energy of the test charge also increases since it is a positive charge. This increase in potential energy means that the kinetic energy of the test charge must decrease to conserve total energy, leading to a slowdown. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between potential, charge, distance, and energy without referencing forces or fields. Ultimately, the test charge's deceleration is a result of gaining potential energy as it approaches the fixed charge.
Perkins332
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For this exercise, imagine a large positive charge +Q fixed at some location in otherwise empty space, far from all other charges. A positive test charge of smaller magnitude +q is launched directly towards the fixed charge. Of course, as the test charge gets closer, the repulsive force exerted on it by the fixed charge slows it down. Your job is to explain why the test charge slows down, but in terms of electric potential and EPE, rather than in terms of fields or forces.

In particular:

•explain how the electrical potential encountered by the test charge changes as it gets closer to the fixed charge, and why

•explain how the EPE of the test charge changes as it gets closer to the fixed charge, and why

On that basis, explain why the test charge +q slows down as it approaches the fixed charge +Q.
Note
Your response shouldn't mention either fields or forces.

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



Electric potential energy is a type of potential energy. Potential energy is defined as energy that is stored within an object. Since the 2 particles form a closed system the total energy must remain the same in the beginning and the end so : Initial kinetic energy + initial potential energy = final kinetic energy + final potential energy. So there for the total initial energy = total final energy. As the particle moves in the direction towards the other particle its potential energy should decrease. We know this from phy 117. For an example a ball at the top of a hill will have more potential energy than once the ball gets to the bottom of the hill.

Electric potential is the electric potential energy / charge. The electric potential energy is going to decrease as the particle gets closer, the charge would remain the same. Son since the top half of the fraction is going to decrease while the bottom stays the same this means that the Electric potential will also decrease as the particle gets closer.

So after I said that this is what my instructor wrote...
Rather than explaining in terms of equations and math, the explanation should be in terms of potential, charge, distance, and energy.

Think about the fixed charge +Q first. It creates electric potential in the space surrounding it. That is, at every point in space, there is a certain electric potential due to the charge +Q - 100 V here, 50 V there, 5000 V there. Which of these locations is closest to the charge? Which is farthest from it?

Thinking about this will tell you what happens to the electric potential encountered by the test charge q as it gets closer to the fixed charge Q: does it rise, or does it fall?

Once you know how the potential changes as the test charge approaches, you can determine how the EPE of the test charge changes: does it increase, or does it decrease?

On that basis, using the energy conservation principle, you can explain why the test charge slows down.

... so after that was said, I am lost. Can someone please help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric potential energy is a type of potential energy. Potential energy is defined as energy that is stored within an object. Since the 2 particles form a closed system the total energy must remain the same in the beginning and the end so : Initial kinetic energy + initial potential energy = final kinetic energy + final potential energy. So there for the total initial energy = total final energy. As the particle moves in the direction towards the other particle its potential energy should decrease. We know this from phy 117. For an example a ball at the top of a hill will have more potential energy than once the ball gets to the bottom of the hill.

You have the right idea in using energy balance, but the bolded part is backwards. Actually the potential energy increases as the particles approach. Gravity doesn't work this way, because it's always attractive. But because two like charges repel, their potential energy is always positive and increases as they get closer. Knowing this, you can immediately see why the test charge slows down: it gains potential energy as it moves closer to the large positive charge, so it must loose kinetic energy. So that's the answer. Now, about the teacher's comments:

Rather than explaining in terms of equations and math, the explanation should be in terms of potential, charge, distance, and energy.

Think about the fixed charge +Q first. It creates electric potential in the space surrounding it. That is, at every point in space, there is a certain electric potential due to the charge +Q - 100 V here, 50 V there, 5000 V there. Which of these locations is closest to the charge? Which is farthest from it?

What they are trying to do here is introduce the concept of potential, or voltage, as distinct from potential energy. So really, when doing this problem they want you to think about the potential field created by the source charge Q first and then use the potential field to find the potential energy of the test charge q.

A quick-and-dirty explanation of potential: You probably learned that the electric field is the force per charge. If a test charge q is placed at a location where the electric field is E, the force on the test charge is F = qE. So we can measure the electric field at a point by placing a test charge there. But the electric field is a "real" thing in itself; even where there are no test charges, there is still a field. In the exact same way, potential or voltage is potential energy per charge, so we have PE = qV for the test charge. But even if the test charge q is not present, there is still a potential field everywhere around Q. For a single source charge Q, this potential field is,

V = kQ/r

(NOT r2!) Where k is the same constant that appears in Coulomb's Law. Because Q is positive, V is positive also. And as r decreases, V increases. So we can picture Q as being at the peak of a "mountain" where height stands for potential. All this exists before we bring in q. But now if we bring it in, its potential energy is,

PE = qV = kQq/r

And because q is positive, PE is also positive. And again, it increases as r decreases, so q must slow down.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top