Why Does a Simple Pendulum Only Exhibit SHM at Small Angles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sexysam_short
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum Shm
AI Thread Summary
A simple pendulum exhibits simple harmonic motion (SHM) only at small angles near the equilibrium position due to the non-linear nature of the restoring force. At larger angles, the relationship between the angle and the restoring force becomes more complex, causing the period of the pendulum to increase rather than remain constant. The acceleration of the pendulum bob is proportional to sin(θ), which approximates θ only for small angles, allowing for SHM. As the angle increases, the pendulum's motion deviates from SHM, and additional vibrations can occur. Therefore, the conditions for SHM are strictly limited to small angular displacements.
sexysam_short
Why is it that a simple pendulum only shows SHM at small angles close to the equilibrium position?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the restoring force is not linear and is only approximately linear at small amplitudes.
 
Consider that if the launch angle of the bob is 180 degrees (the "string" would have to rigid to maintain the length), the bob would balance there. Effectively this means the period is infinite for amplitude 180 degrees. It is easy to see then that as the amplitude becomes larger, the period is no longer given by the simple formula (i.e. constant independent of amplitude), but will increase.
 
If you resolve the gravitational force on a pendulum bob at angle θ to the vertical into a component perpendicular to the circular path (which just puts tension on the pendulum arm) and the component parallel to the path (which accelerates and decelerates the pendulum) you find that, from the right triangle set up, the parallel acceleration is proportional to sin(θ). For small values of θ that is very close to θ itself. It is that simplicity: acceleration= θ that gives "simple harmonic motion". For larger angles, we would have to use sin(&theta); instead of θ and that gives a much harder problem.
 
Also, something I've noticed is when the angle is fairly large, the pendulum begins to slightly vibrate as it swings. This indicates it's no longer undergoing SHM alone.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top