Why does a^x = e^(x(lna)) and how can this help with finding the derivative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jessepye
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding why the expression a^x can be rewritten as e^(x(ln(a))) and how this transformation aids in finding the derivative using the chain rule. The initial step involves taking the natural logarithm of both sides, allowing the exponent to be brought down, which leads to the equation x * ln(a) = ln(y). By exponentiating both sides, the relationship e^(x * ln(a)) = y is established, confirming that e^(x * ln(a)) equals a^x. This method clarifies the connection between exponential and logarithmic functions, facilitating easier differentiation. The conversation also touches on effective strategies for searching related mathematical concepts online.
jessepye
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi every one, first post, so let me know if I'm not following any of the rules.

I'm studying Calculus, looking at the rules for deriving the function a^x. The first step is to change a^x to e^(x(lna)). From there, it's easy to use the chain rule to find the derivative.

Why can you do that first step though? I've tried googling around, and can't find an explanation.

Also, any tips on doing google searches for this kind of topic? I've tried pasting the equation into google; doing searches for "natural log" guides, "e" guides, and a browsed a few precalculus sites, but haven't found the answer I'm looking for.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ax=(eln(a))x

Do you see what to do from there?
 
Ah! I get it now.

(elna) is equal to a

and

(ab)c = ab*c

so

ax = (eln(a))x = eln(a)*x

Thanks for the super fast reply! I feel silly for not figuring that out sooner.
 
EDIT You got it before I typed this

I think this is right, I'm just trying to remember it off the top of my head as my textbook is in school.

Let the value of a^{x} be equal to y

a^{x} = y

Take natural log of both sides

ln(a^{x}) = ln(y)

Then we can bring the exponent out of the bracket

x * ln(a) = ln(y)

Then we put both sides as the power of e to cancel the ln on the right

e^{x * ln(a)} = e^{ln(y)}

e^{x * ln(a)} = y

Then since a^{x} = y we sub that in for y and get

e^{x * ln(a)} = a^{x}
 
Another way to see the same thing is to note that aln(x)= ln(x^a) so that e^{xln(a)}= e^{ln(a^x)}. Then, because "f(x)= e^x" and "g(x)= ln(x)" are inverse functions, e^{ln(a^x)}= a^x.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top