Why does an electron not stick to the nucleus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icecubebeast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Nucleus
AI Thread Summary
Electrons do not stick to the nucleus due to the principles of quantum mechanics, specifically the uncertainty principle. If an electron were to be confined close to the nucleus, its position would be well-defined, leading to a high uncertainty in momentum and increased kinetic energy. Atoms prefer to be in low-energy states, so electrons occupy regions where their position is more uncertain, resulting in stable orbits at a distance. The quantum mechanical model describes the probability of finding an electron at various distances from the nucleus rather than defining a fixed orbital path. Additionally, there is a small probability that electrons can be found within the nucleus, which can lead to phenomena like electron capture in certain isotopes.
icecubebeast
Messages
66
Reaction score
3
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
 
Bystander said:
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
 
icecubebeast said:
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
It is due to the uncertainty principle. If the electron is stuck to the nucleus then the uncertainty in its position is very small so the uncertainty in its momentum is very large. This in turn means that the average kinetic energy is high. Since an atom likes to be in a low-energy state it will give off energy to go to a state where the position is more uncertain and the momentum less uncertain.
 
  • Like
Likes icecubebeast
Bystander said:
The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus.

In fact, an atomic electron generally does have a small probability of being located inside the nucleus (very small distance r from the center of the atom/nucleus). In certain isotopes, this produces a type of nuclear decay called electron capture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
 
icecubebeast said:
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?

This is a good time to introduce to you, if you haven't discover it already, the https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/physics-faq.209/ , and https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-dont-electrons-crash-into-the-nucleus-in-atoms.511179/ in particular.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top