Why Does Angular Momentum Use a Cross Product Instead of a Dot Product?

Thread starter CrazyNeutrino
Start date Oct 20, 2012
Tags

Angular Angular momentum Momentum

AI Thread Summary

Angular momentum is defined using a cross product because it incorporates the direction of the vectors involved, specifically the position vector and momentum vector. The formula r x p reflects the perpendicular relationship between these vectors, which is essential in determining the rotational effect. In contrast, a dot product does not account for direction, making it unsuitable for angular momentum calculations. The use of a cross product ensures that the resulting angular momentum vector is orthogonal to the plane formed by the position and momentum vectors. This fundamental distinction is crucial for accurately describing rotational dynamics.

Oct 20, 2012

CrazyNeutrino

Can someone please explain why angular momentum involves a cross product?

Why is it r x p and not r . P
Why a cross product and not a dot product?

Physics news on Phys.org

Oct 20, 2012

Rajini

Hi,
Angular momentum involves a perpendicular direction, i.e. in general when you take direction into account, it should be a cross product. In dot product no direction.
Cheers, Rajini

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »