Why Does Aviation Fuel Spoil Over Time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of plot holes in movies, specifically referencing "Battlefield Earth" and its implausibility regarding aviation fuel. The main question raised is about why aviation fuel spoils over time, particularly focusing on kerosene. It is noted that while kerosene is a hydrocarbon, it can still degrade, potentially due to oxidation or contamination. The conversation suggests that gasoline decays faster than kerosene because it contains additives that enhance combustion, which may not be present in aviation fuel. A link is provided to further explain the degradation of gasoline, implying that similar processes could affect kerosene, albeit at a slower rate.
SkepticJ
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Number of weeks back I was reading in Wikipedia on plot holes in movies, one of the mentioned plot holes is in an awful movie I'm going to do my best to avoid: Battlefield Earth. But I digress. The plot hole, among others, is aviation fuel spoils after a few years, so it would be impossible to fuel aircraft on some stored for 1,000.

My question is why does it spoil? Is it the kerosene that goes bad, or something else? If the kerosene, why does it go bad? Just a hydrocarbon, unless it's bombarded by UV light, I don't see why it should ever go bad. Nothing really eats it, yet, except perhaps some kind of GM bacterium.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Here is a link that explains what happens to Gasoline I would think the same process happens to kerosene just at a slower rate.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/060825.html
 
Hmmm, that makes sense. Plus car gas would decay faster than kerosene since oxidizers are mixed into gas to make it burn better. Not sure if kerosene-based aviation fuel has this done as well--I've found no mention of it.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top