Why does chlorate seem to break the pattern of polyatomic ions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FysicsPhorums
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ion
AI Thread Summary
Chlorate (ClO3-) appears to deviate from the expected pattern of polyatomic ions, which typically have four oxygens and increasing charges across the periodic table. However, the presence of perchlorate (ClO4-) indicates that chlorine can accommodate varying numbers of oxygen atoms while maintaining a -1 charge. The naming conventions for these ions are based on their relative abundance and oxidation states, with "ate" typically assigned to the most common form. Chlorate's naming as "ate" despite having three oxygens is consistent with other elements like nitrogen and bromine, which also have oxyanions with three oxygens. Overall, while trends exist in polyatomic ions, exceptions like chlorate highlight the complexity of chemical nomenclature.
FysicsPhorums
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was reviewing the polyatomic ions, and on the third row of the periodic table they seemed to follow a pattern going from left to right on the periodic table. For example:
Silicate = SiO44-; phosphate = PO43-; sulfate = SO42-

For row 3 on the periodic table, it looks like each polyatomic has 4 oxygens, the charge increases by one as one moves to the right along the periodic table, and I think the oxidation numbers of the non-oxygen elements goes +4, +5, +6, respectively. However, chlorate is ClO3-, which seems to break the pattern, since it has only 3 oxygens instead of 4, and the oxidation number on chlorine of +5, instead of +7.

Is there any reason chlorate seems to "break" the pattern of the polyatomic ions so far, and any reason why for naming purposes, ClO3- is chlorate, instead of chlorite (like PO33- is phosphite, for example)?

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Well actually there is a Perchlorate ion that is ClO4 that has a negative 1 charge so the pattern isn't broken. Chlorine is just very flexible in a sense because it can have anywhere between 1-4 oxygen atoms and still have a minus 1 charge.
ClO is Hypochlorite
ClO2 is Chlorite
ClO3 is Chlorate
ClO4 is Perchlorate
The naming has to do with the other form of the polyatomic ion can be.
 
So is ClO4- called perchlorate simply because there is no ClO5-? I understand how perchlorate would be named relative to chlorate, and so on, but I'm trying to figure out why the naming for the other polyatomic ions I mentioned had 4 oxygens for the "ate" names. But for chlorate, the form with 3 oxygens carries the "ate" name. Thanks again for the help!
 
In general, the most common oxyanion for an element will end in ate. You will find many trends in the periodic table, but you will also find many exceptions.

Some examples I can think of for ate's that have 3 oxygens are nitrate, bromate, iodate, carbonate (although that has a minus 2 charge)

And I don't think there is an element that has 5 different oxyanions.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top