Why does EMP 'deactivate' electronic devices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bladibla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electronic
AI Thread Summary
EMP deactivates electronic devices by generating large voltages that can damage their internal components. Solid-state devices are particularly vulnerable as modest voltages can disrupt their p-n junctions. In contrast, vacuum tubes and some military-grade solid-state devices exhibit greater resistance to EMP effects. However, devices connected to long wires, such as power lines or antennas, are at higher risk due to the potential for large currents that can cause physical damage. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for assessing the impact of EMP on various electronic systems.
Bladibla
Messages
357
Reaction score
1
Why does EMP 'deactivate' electronic devices?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bladibla said:
Why does EMP 'deactivate' electronic devices?

thanks!

EMP generates very large voltages in wires. The mechanism by which it destroys electronics depends on the electronics.

Solid state devices are destroyed by relatively modest voltages which break down the p-n junctions.

Vacuum tubes are much more resistant, as are some special solid state military devices. If you generate too much voltage on a bipolar junction RF transistor, it's gone. If you generate too much voltage on a vacuum tube, you'll be fine as long as you don't melt the plate or other electrodes. (You can literally run a vacuum tube so that its plate visibly glows without destroying it - if you don't keep it up too long).

Even electronically rugged devices which are connected to very long wires (powerlines, large antennas, etc) will be likely to destoryed by an EMP, as very large currents will devlop in that case, which will generate enough power to melt wires and other conductors.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top