Why Does Gravity Around a Black Hole Remain Normal Until Extremely Close?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity around a black hole remains normal at a distance due to the inverse square law, where gravitational force decreases with the square of the distance from the mass. However, as one approaches the black hole, gravity's strength increases significantly due to the unique nature of black holes, where mass is concentrated in an extremely small radius. The gravitational force near a black hole is described by a modified formula that accounts for this small radius, leading to a much stronger gravitational pull. This phenomenon is a result of the immense mass of the black hole being compressed into a negligible size, allowing for a stronger gravitational effect at close range. Understanding these principles is crucial for comprehending the behavior of gravity in extreme environments like black holes.
avito009
Messages
184
Reaction score
4
Why the gravity around a black hole remains normal unless you get extremely close?

But first: How far from Earth is there zero gravity?

Gravity declines as a function of the square of the distance from a mass. Earth's gravity is less and less as one goes further away, but is never zero. A quarter of a million miles from earth, gravity is still strong enough to hold the moon. Earth has very tiny affects on the orbits of Mars and Venus, millions of miles away.

The strength of the gravitational force between two objects with fixed masses decreases as the distance between them increases. It follows an inverse square law, with the force being proportional to 1/r2 (r being the distance). As the distance between two bodies increases the intensity of gravitational force decreases by a factor of 1/r2, where r = distance between two bodies.

Now the question is that why is a black hole's gravity not so strong far away when it is so strong near it?

A black hole is when a massive star dies, it leaves behind a small, dense remnant core. If the core's mass is more than about three times the mass of the Sun, the force of gravity overwhelms all other forces and produces a black hole.

But gravity near a black hole doesn't increases as 1/r2, but instead by the much greater: (1/r2) / (1-r/R), where R is the radius of the hole. But at a long distance from the black hole the force of gravity falls off as the inverse square of the distance, just as it does for normal objects.

Imagine a star 100 times as massive as our Sun and squashed down to -- well nothing. Infinite density but zero size -- this is a black hole. An object with the mass of 100 suns but with zero radius. So you end up with an object with so much mass and zero or at least negligible radius that all that mass is compressed into such a small area that's it's gravity is so great that not even light can escape it. (Mass of black hole is more so gravity is more)

So since gravity = GM/r2. R is the radius and so since R is very small the numerator would be greater because it has more mass and the denominator R is small so gravity is too much.

So the question I have is that why the gravity around a black hole remains normal unless you get extremely close?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
avito009 said:
But gravity near a black hole doesn't increases as 1/r2, but instead by the much greater: (1/r2) / (1-r/R), where R is the radius of the hole.
Where did you get that idea from? It's inverse square law all the way down.

And it gets so strong, because you can get so close to all that mass, without leaving any of it behind, as you'd do with a normal star.
 
avito009, you should read Romero's recent paper - http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3318. He is an expert on the subject.
 
  • Like
Likes ForTheLoveOfPhysics
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top