Why does haemotocrit decrease in acute blood loss?

AI Thread Summary
In acute blood loss, both red blood cells (RBCs) and fluid are lost, leading to a decrease in hematocrit levels. The body's compensatory mechanisms, such as kidney function, work to restore fluid volume quickly, but red blood cell production takes longer, typically several weeks. This discrepancy in recovery times contributes to the decrease in hematocrit. Additionally, the reduction in mechanical pressure following blood loss prompts a rebalancing of interstitial fluid, which contrasts with conditions like edema.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
In acute blood loss both RBC and fluid is lost, so why doesn't haemotocrit stay normal. I know compensatory mechanism would increase the fluid, eg kidney. But red blood cell prodcution would take few weeks. Is that the reason haemotocrit decreases? Thanks :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Indeed. Plasma would be restored way before RBC count.
 
The decrease in mechanical pressure results in a reballance of intersititial fluid (eg think the opposite of edema).
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top