Why Does Light Take 8 Minutes to Reach Earth from the Sun

stavragy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question:
Light experiences zero time and zero distance so for a photon it must be here and there at the same instance. As the moment a photon is created it must be at position A and B at the same moment.
So for a Photon it takes zero time to reach Earth from the sun.
Why do we then see light taking 8 minutes to reach us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stavragy said:
So for a Photon it takes zero time to reach Earth from the sun.
This is neither correct nor relevant. See the FAQ: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511170

stavragy said:
Why do we then see light taking 8 minutes to reach us?
Because the sun is a distance of c*8min away in our frame.
 
stavragy said:
Question:
Light experiences zero time ...Why do we then see light taking 8 minutes to reach us?
We experience 8 minutes, not the light.
 
A.T. said:
stavragy said:
Question:
Light experiences zero time ...Why do we then see light taking 8 minutes to reach us?
We experience 8 minutes, not the light.
What do we experience that takes 8 minutes (aside from the fact that it takes 8 minutes for our clock to tick through 8 minutes)?
 
ghwellsjr said:
What do we experience that takes 8 minutes (aside from the fact that it takes 8 minutes for our clock to tick through 8 minutes)?
The time that light takes to go from the sun to the earth, as measured in our frame of reference, of course. (Which is what the ticking clock measures.) How long it takes light to go from the Earth to the sun in any other frame of reference, including that of light, is not relevant.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top