Why does melting point decrease for impure solid?

AI Thread Summary
Impure solids, such as crude acetaminophen, exhibit lower melting points than pure solids due to increased entropy in mixtures, which reduces the driving force for melting. The presence of impurities disrupts the crystal lattice, weakening intermolecular forces and making it easier for the solid to transition to a liquid state. This means that less energy is required to break apart the molecular interactions in impure substances. As a result, higher temperatures are necessary for melting impure solids compared to their pure counterparts. Understanding these thermodynamic principles is essential for interpreting melting point variations in laboratory settings.
erjkism
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Okay, i am doing a lab involving crude acetaminophen and pure acetaminophen. The crude acetaminophen is supposed to have a lower melting point than the pure acetaminophen...

how does that work and why? does it have to do with thermodynamics or what??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The substance its mixed with may have a lower melting point; that's my guess anyway.
 
Mixtures have higher entropy than pure substances. Because the transition from solid to liquid is mostly driven by the increase in entropy (ΔS = Sliquid - Ssolid), increasing Ssolid lowers the overall ΔS, lowering the driving force for melting. Since melting is less favorable, you need higher temperatures to accomplish it.
 
ahhh... i see

thanks man
 
You may also think in terms of intermolecular forces. In crystal molecules are packed in such a way that their interactions are strongest. When you add some other compound it stretches the crystal lattice, molecules are not in optimal positions and their interactions are weaker, thus less energy is required to break them apart.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top