Why Does My Capacitance Power Calculation Not Match the Given Answer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of current, power, and energy for a capacitor with a capacitance of 0.01 Farads and a voltage function of v(t) = 100*cos(2π60t). The user correctly calculated the current as i(t) = -120π*sin(2π60t) Amperes but found a discrepancy when calculating power, which did not match the expected answer of -18,850sin(2π120t) Watts. The solution involves applying a trigonometric identity for Sin(2X) to reconcile the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor behavior in AC circuits
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, specifically Sin(2X)
  • Knowledge of calculus for integration of power to find energy
  • Basic electrical engineering concepts, including current and power equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of trigonometric identities in AC circuit analysis
  • Learn about the relationship between current and voltage in capacitive circuits
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating energy stored in capacitors
  • Review the derivation of power equations in reactive components
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, particularly those studying circuit analysis and power calculations involving capacitors, as well as educators looking for examples of common calculation errors in AC circuits.

k_squared
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The voltage across a capacitor with a value of 0.01 Farads is v(t) 100*cos(2pi60t). Find i(t),p(t),and w(t).


Homework Equations



i(t)=Cv'(t) [current]
p(t)=i(t)v(t) [power]
w= integral of p(t) [Energy stored over time]

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to correctly determine the current of capacitance, -120*pi*sin(2pi60t) Amperes. However, this multiplied by the voltage, does NOT equal the given answer of -18,850sin(2pi120t) Watts.

Could someone please clear this up for me? I would've used proper symbols, but the test is quite shortly, no time to mess with that ... :/

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using a trig identity for Sin(2X).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K