Why does Newton's law of gravitation involve a cube on the bottom?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational force equation, specifically why it includes a cube in the denominator, represented as ##|x|^3##, instead of simply using ##|x|^2##. The gravitational force is expressed as a vector, where ##G\frac{M m}{|\mathbf{x}|^2}## denotes the magnitude of the force, while ##\frac{\mathbf{x}}{|\mathbf{x}|}## indicates the direction. The cube in the denominator accounts for the vector nature of the force, ensuring both magnitude and direction are accurately represented. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly applying Newton's law of gravitation in three-dimensional space. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping the underlying principles rather than relying solely on memorization.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
according
to my calculus III textbook, the gravitational force acting on an object at ##x = <x,y,z>## is ##F(x)=-\frac{mMG}{|x|^3} x ##. What's the point of having a cube on the bottom. Why shouldn't I memorize it as ##F(x)=-\frac{mMG}{|x|^2} ##

Homework Equations


See above

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calpalned said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
according
to my calculus III textbook, the gravitational force acting on an object at ##x = <x,y,z>## is ##F(x)=-\frac{mMG}{|x|^3} x ##. What's the point of having a cube on the bottom. Why shouldn't I memorize it as ##F(x)=-\frac{mMG}{|x|^2} ##

Homework Equations


See above

The Attempt at a Solution

IMG_5063.JPG
 
x is a vector. ##G\frac{M m}{|\mathbf{x}|^2}## is the magnitude of the force, while ##\frac{\mathbf{x}}{|\mathbf{x}|}## is a unit vector in the direction of the force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top