- 499

- 37

Could someone explain Jan-Markus Schwindt's idea, published under the provocative title

please? Frankly I can't even understand the opening paragraph of the abstract.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8447

I don't get that. The state vector has direction. In fact that's all it's got. But it's a direction relative to any arbitrary basis. I don't think I'm misinterpreting Schwindt's meaning as he goes on to identify a way of factorizing the space, where each branch "peacefully rotates" and nothing else happens. He calls these Nirvana frames.

But I'm out of my depth with tensors and I find it hard to extract the logic from Schwindt's exposition so can someone explain what it all means?

**Nothing happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation**

http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.8447

*Since the scalar product is the only internal structure of a Hilbert space, all*

vectors of norm 1 are equivalent, in the sense that they form a perfect sphere in

the Hilbert space, on which every vector looks the same. The state vector of the

universe contains no information that distinguishes it from other state vectors of

the same Hilbert space.

vectors of norm 1 are equivalent, in the sense that they form a perfect sphere in

the Hilbert space, on which every vector looks the same. The state vector of the

universe contains no information that distinguishes it from other state vectors of

the same Hilbert space.

I don't get that. The state vector has direction. In fact that's all it's got. But it's a direction relative to any arbitrary basis. I don't think I'm misinterpreting Schwindt's meaning as he goes on to identify a way of factorizing the space, where each branch "peacefully rotates" and nothing else happens. He calls these Nirvana frames.

But I'm out of my depth with tensors and I find it hard to extract the logic from Schwindt's exposition so can someone explain what it all means?

Last edited by a moderator: