Why Does Planck's Law Assume Oscillator Energy Applies to Electromagnetic Modes?

AI Thread Summary
Planck's law begins with the assumption that the energy of an oscillator with frequency ν is quantized in units of hν, leading to an average energy expression. The discussion questions why the average energy of electromagnetic radiation modes with the same frequency ν is considered equivalent. It suggests that electromagnetic radiation in a black-body cavity at temperature T behaves similarly to quantum oscillators. This analogy supports the idea that the distribution of energies of electromagnetic waves follows Planck's law. The relationship between oscillators and electromagnetic modes is central to understanding black-body radiation.
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
The derivation of Planck's law in my textbook begins with the assumption that the energy of an oscillator with frequency ##\nu## is quantised in units of ##h\nu##. It follows that the average energy of such an oscillator (in equilibrium with a reservoir at temperature ##T##) will be
<E>=\frac{h\nu}{e^{h\nu/kT}-1}.

Then, the textbook asserts that the average energy of a mode of electromagnetic radiation with frequency ##\nu## will be the same, and I don't see why this should be true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
The derivation of Planck's law in my textbook begins with the assumption that the energy of an oscillator with frequency ##\nu## is quantised in units of ##h\nu##. It follows that the average energy of such an oscillator (in equilibrium with a reservoir at temperature ##T##) will be
<E>=\frac{h\nu}{e^{h\nu/kT}-1}.

Then, the textbook asserts that the average energy of a mode of electromagnetic radiation with frequency ##\nu## will be the same, and I don't see why this should be true.
I think they are just saying that electromagnetic radiation in a resonating (black-body) cavity at temperature T behaves in a way that is analogous to the quantum oscillator: ie. the distribution of energies of electromagnetic waves inside the resonating cavity is given by Planck's law.

AM
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top