Why Does qEt/m Represent Drift Speed in a Conductor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation v = qEt/m represents the drift speed of charge carriers in a conductor, where v is the drift speed, q is the charge of the particle, E is the electric field strength, and m is the mass of the particle. The discussion clarifies that while qEt/m gives the final velocity of the particle, the average drift speed is indeed approximated as qEt/(2m) due to the time between collisions. This approximation is valid in introductory physics, where the effects of small values are often simplified for ease of understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly electric fields and charge.
  • Familiarity with the principles of particle motion and collisions.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of drift velocity in conductors using the Drude model.
  • Learn about the impact of temperature on conductivity and drift speed.
  • Explore the concept of mean free path in relation to particle collisions in conductors.
  • Investigate the differences between drift speed and thermal speed of charge carriers.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying introductory physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and electrical engineering concepts related to conductors.

anonymousphys
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


v=qEt/m
t=time between each collision
q=charge on particle
m=mass of particle
E=electric field

Why is this the average velocity/drift speed in a conductor?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Doesn't qEt/m = the final velocity of the particle. So isn't the average velocity qEt/(2m)?
Is there something missing in my logic?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Still not too sure about this problem. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
In in introductory physics, do we just assume qEt/(2m) = qEt/(m) because the values are so small?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K