Why does reduced blood flow in veins cause numbness?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood Cause Flow
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mechanisms behind numbness in the legs, particularly in relation to reduced blood flow in veins and its potential effects on sensation. Participants explore the roles of arteries and veins in blood circulation and how these may relate to nerve function and numbness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how reduced blood flow in veins can cause numbness, suggesting that it is arterial blood flow that primarily affects sensation.
  • Another participant explains that arteries carry oxygenated blood necessary for nerve function, and that a lack of nutrients from arterial blood can lead to numbness.
  • Some participants note that while veins are responsible for returning deoxygenated blood, blockage of a single vein is unlikely to cause numbness due to the presence of multiple compensatory veins.
  • There is a suggestion that complete blockage of a vein could lead to more severe issues than numbness, such as gas gangrene.
  • A participant asks for clarification on what is meant by "reduced blood flow in veins," proposing various scenarios like pooling blood or blood clots, indicating that the implications may differ based on the specific situation.
  • Another participant agrees that the examples provided could illustrate different causes of reduced blood flow in veins, emphasizing the need for clarity on the specific condition being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between reduced blood flow in veins and numbness, with some emphasizing the role of arterial flow while others seek clarification on specific scenarios involving veins. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact mechanisms and conditions that lead to numbness.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the issue, noting that different conditions affecting blood flow in veins could lead to varying outcomes, and that assumptions about the relationship between arterial and venous blood flow may not be universally applicable.

sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Last topic I made was misunderstood and locked so basically what I want to know is the mechanism behind numbness in legs. I don't have a numbness problem or seeking medical advice.

If veins have reduced blood flow how does this create numbness. The nerves are still supplied by the arteries. If veins have reduced flow are arteries also affected. Isn't it reduced artery flow that creates numbness, how does veins cause it.

Thanks :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Veins carry oxygen-poor blood cells back to the heart and lungs to be re-oxygenated, so it is reduced blood flow in the arteries that can cause a drop in sensation in the legs, arms, hands, etc. Arteries contain freshly oxygenated blood and carry it throughout the body. As you mentioned, it is the capillaries that directly provide the nutrients to nerve cells which in turn allows for signal transduction to occur, but it is the arteries that supply the capillaries with fresh blood.

Nerve cells require a continuous flow of nutrients, especially Ca2+ and Na+ ions in order to properly function. As you may recall, nerve signal transduction depends on the nerve cell being able to route a wave of depolarization across the length of the axon. Without the vital nutrients and oxygen that fresh blood supplies, the electrical gradient can't be produced, resulting in no signal being sent to the brain. Your body interprets this lack of signal as numbness. You can try this out on your own by pressing against the large artery on the inside of your upper arm. After a few minutes you'll notice a drop in the sensation of your entire limb, which is due to your nerve cells not having fresh nutrients.

As for veins, blocking a vein will only lower the amount of blood that is being re-oxygenated, but there are hundreds of veins in your body that can compensate for a single vein being blocked, so it is very unlikely that blocking a single vein will have any effect. The only way that vein blockage could cause problem is if it is completely blocked off, resulting in a buildup of oxygen-poor blood not being able to leave a site, at which point numbness will be the least of your worries, and gas gangrene and swelling will become more pressing issues.
 
Biophreak said:
Veins carry oxygen-poor blood cells back to the heart and lungs to be re-oxygenated, so it is reduced blood flow in the arteries that can cause a drop in sensation in the legs, arms, hands, etc. Arteries contain freshly oxygenated blood and carry it throughout the body. As you mentioned, it is the capillaries that directly provide the nutrients to nerve cells which in turn allows for signal transduction to occur, but it is the arteries that supply the capillaries with fresh blood.

Nerve cells require a continuous flow of nutrients, especially Ca2+ and Na+ ions in order to properly function. As you may recall, nerve signal transduction depends on the nerve cell being able to route a wave of depolarization across the length of the axon. Without the vital nutrients and oxygen that fresh blood supplies, the electrical gradient can't be produced, resulting in no signal being sent to the brain. Your body interprets this lack of signal as numbness. You can try this out on your own by pressing against the large artery on the inside of your upper arm. After a few minutes you'll notice a drop in the sensation of your entire limb, which is due to your nerve cells not having fresh nutrients.

As for veins, blocking a vein will only lower the amount of blood that is being re-oxygenated, but there are hundreds of veins in your body that can compensate for a single vein being blocked, so it is very unlikely that blocking a single vein will have any effect. The only way that vein blockage could cause problem is if it is completely blocked off, resulting in a buildup of oxygen-poor blood not being able to leave a site, at which point numbness will be the least of your worries, and gas gangrene and swelling will become more pressing issues.

Nicely explained :smile: Thanks :smile:
 
Can you explain more clearly what you mean by reduced blood flow in veins? I can think of several different scenarios that could potentially be described that way, and the answer would be different for each one. For example, do you mean pooling of blood in veins, such as with varicose veins when the blood runs backward through defective valves, or do you mean a blood clot within the veins, or could you mean lack of blood getting to the veins (which might imply there is also a reduced arterial flow)?
 
Any of the examples you gave would be good ones to illustrate what is meant by reduced blood flow in veins. I wasn't referring to any specific cause for reduced blood flow in veins, just saying that, in the event of reduced blood flow, those symptoms would be what would result.
 
Biophreak said:
Any of the examples you gave would be good ones to illustrate what is meant by reduced blood flow in veins. I wasn't referring to any specific cause for reduced blood flow in veins, just saying that, in the event of reduced blood flow, those symptoms would be what would result.

Your answer is not complete in the case of a blocked vein or veins with incompetent valves, only in terms of an arterial source of reduced blood flow, which is why I'm trying to find out from the OP which condition s/he is referring to.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
23K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
325K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K