Why does saturation of a ferromagnetic result in non-sinusoidal current?

AI Thread Summary
When a ferromagnetic material saturates, the current becomes non-sinusoidal due to the non-linear relationship between the magnetic field and the current. As the magnetic domains align in saturation, increases in current do not result in proportional changes in the magnetic field. This leads to a reduced opposing voltage, allowing the current to rise more than expected under linear conditions. The phenomenon is particularly evident around the saturation peaks, where the core's behavior deviates from linearity. Understanding this interaction between the magnetic and electric fields is crucial for analyzing transformer magnetizing currents.
tonyjk
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Hello... I have a question: Physically why when a ferromagnetic is saturated the current is non-sinusoidal ( I'm taking the example of the magnetising current of a transformer). I know graphically and mathemeticalty why( from the hysteresis loop) but In reality what happens(I'm talking about magnetic field or/and electric field) . I know the magnetic domain of the iron core will be aligned etc... but why there's a non-sinusoidal current... Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The principle of an inductor is that it surrounds its coils with a magnetic field (that field being produced by the current in the coils). So any change in current in the coils induces a voltage in the coils and this voltage tends to oppose the change in current that produces it. Ideally, there exists a linear relationship between the current and the field.

Around those peaks where the core starts to saturate (i.e., show non-linear behaviour), a further increase in current fails to produce the full expected change in the magnetic field, this in turn induces less opposing voltage to oppose that current, with a consequence that the current is able to increase more than for expected linear behaviour.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top