Why Does Setting m=0 Matter in Calculating Complex Numbers?

ahmed markhoos
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
Hi,I'm facing a problem finding the values of complex numbers, I'll put two examples then I'll explain the issue.

ex1: (-e)^{iπ} , my answer is (-e)^{π^2±2mπ^2} The book answer is (-e)^{π^2}

ex2: e^{2 arctanh(i)} , my answer is e^{[iπ/2±mπ/2]} = ie^{±mπ/2} The book answer is i

just to mention that the book answer are exactly like wolfram alpha's answers, the problem is that the answers were set as m=0 while they didn't do the same thing for other problems, When can I set m=0 and when I cannot do that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ahmed markhoos said:
When can I set m=0 and when I cannot do that?
Keep the m if you need some logarithm or inverse trigonometric function somewhere, unless the problem statement specifies the branch you are supposed to use.
 
  • Like
Likes ahmed markhoos
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top