Why does sound wave over 20000Hz or lower 20 Hz

AI Thread Summary
Sound waves above 20,000 Hz and below 20 Hz cannot produce horizontal waves due to limitations in human hearing and the physics of sound propagation. Humans cannot hear these frequencies because their ears are not designed for such ranges, while animals like dogs can detect higher frequencies. Lower frequencies require significant energy to move air, necessitating large speakers and specially designed environments for effective sound production. Conversely, higher frequencies are constrained by the speed of air molecule vibration and the density of the air. These factors collectively limit the efficiency of sound wave production and reception across the frequency spectrum.
yu_wing_sin
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Why does sound wave over 20000Hz or lower 20 Hz cannot produce the horizontal wave?

Although this is the reason why people can't hear those sound waves, is there any reasons or theory that can explain this phenomenon?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
People can't hear those sounds because the human ear is unable to, not because of the physics of the sound waves. Dogs can hear much higher frequencies than humans.
 
But nonetheless there are limits to the the efficient propagation of waves.

For instance, the amount of energy to move walls of air at frequencies below 20 Hz is so large that the only way to efficiently do so is with 'speakers' and special cabinets which are huge, and by using special 'rooms' tuned to the frequencies you want to produce. Basically, the lower the frequency, the more energy it costs, for a given effectiveness or perceived volume, and this is partly a limiting factor in the production of sound, as well as in the reception of it. (Your ears are too small to efficiently receive low frequencies, however, whales and elephants are able to easily hear these sounds.)

At higher frequencies, limits are imposed by the speed at which air molecules can be forced to vibrate and impact upon one another, and also, the frequency is affected by the density (space between the molecules) of the air.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top