Why does surface area not directly affect normal force in friction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter starablaze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Normal
AI Thread Summary
Surface area does not directly affect the normal force because the normal force is determined by the weight of the object and the electromagnetic interactions between the object and the surface. While it might seem that a larger surface area would increase the normal force, the pressure exerted by the object remains constant, leading to a compensatory change in pressure density. Consequently, the frictional force, calculated as the product of the friction coefficient and the normal force, remains unchanged despite variations in surface area. The discussion introduces the concept of force density, indicating that changes in area and pressure density offset each other. Ultimately, the relationship between surface area and friction is more complex than a direct correlation.
starablaze
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
could you tell me why the surface area does not affect the surface area? isn't the normal force due to the electromagnetic interactions between the body and the surface? so the greater the surface area, the greater the normal force,right?

so the frictional force will depend on surface area,in the expression

friction=mu x normal force

no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact, I think we can define a force (areal) density f here.
And the frictional force is:
F(fric)=Nu=[f1 x A(area)]u=f2 x A, N is the pressure (the body give to the suface),u is friction coefficient,f1 is the pressure density, f2 is the frictional force density
for a given body, the pressure N is fixed, and the change of the area can only affect the pressure density and so the frictional force density.

So,although the area is changed, the force density is also changed, and fortunately they happen to cancel out.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top