Why does the acceleration of a pendulum depend on Rθ and not x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the acceleration of a pendulum and its angular displacement, specifically why acceleration is expressed as Rθ'' instead of x. The force acting on the pendulum is defined as Fres = -mgsinθ, which leads to the equation mRθ'' = -mgsinθ. The key point raised is the comparison of characteristic length scales, questioning how Rθ relates to Cartesian coordinates like x. It is clarified that Rθ shares the same units as R, making them comparable in terms of measurement. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need to understand the relationship between angular and linear displacements in pendulum motion.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Okay I hope I can write this so it makes sense what I am thinking.
For a pendulum you have:

Fres = -mgsinθ
And Fres points along the circumference:
So:
mRθ'' = -mgsinθ

I wonna discuss this property that you can just express the acceleration as Rθ''. In a cartesian coordinate frame your acceleration would depend on the characteristic length scale of x. How do you know that the characteristic length scale of Rθ is the same as x? I know it sounds weird, but I hope you understand what I am going at.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm not sure what you mean by "characteristic length scale" but I suspect it has to do either with the units of measurement or a specific length in the problem.

The angle, \theta is "dimensionless" so that "R\theta" has the same units as R. Whatever "length scale" you are using for R also applies to R\theta.
 


are you asking if X and Y are measured in meters then would r*theta be measured in meters?
 


no rather something like this: If we imagine that at some point the x-axis of our coordinate system tangential to the arc then the pendulum will move a distance dx measured in cartesian coordinates. How can we know that dx=rdθ, I mean what is it that says that these differentials are comparable? After all what if we made r bigger?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top