Why Does the Continuity of \( f(x) = x^m \sin(1/x) \) Fail at Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parameter
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Re: part A: I think this is a "setup" to make you think the answer is easy. Yes, it appears that: for m =1,2,3,4 ... etc, the function is continuous at x=0. Your logic looks good to me.

However, the sin(1/x) function oscillates infinitely fast as x --> 0, so I think you'll find the answers to B and C to be surprising.
 
how to solve it?
 
Can you differentiate f(x) "formally" ? I get this:

f'(x)= mxm-1sin(1/x) + xm-1cos(1/x)(-1)x-2

For the case of m=1, I get:

f'(x) = sin(1/x) - cos(1/x)/x2

The first term doesn't approach anything as x--> 0. It oscillates infinitely fast between +1 and -1. No limit, therefore not continuous.

Also, in second term, cos(1/x) -->1, but 1/x2 --> infinity, so again no limit.

Your assignment, Mr. Phelps, should you choose to accept it ... :) ... is to find an m > 0 where f'(0) is continuous. See if you can find one.
 
i got a solution to A
and it says
some thing about

if m=0 then
<br /> <br /> x_n = \frac{1}{(2n)\pi} <br />
i don't know how they came up with this Xn
and what i need to do with it
??
 
Hello,
Oops, I missed the m > OR = 0 part.
For f(x) = xmsin(1/x)
If m=0, then f(x) = sin(1/x)
So, for m=0, your logic for testing continuity of f(x) at zero breaks down. Sin(1/x) is not continuous at 0.

Now, regarding that "solution" you found that says:
x_n = \frac{1}{(2n)\pi}
Hmm. Well, let's look at when sin(1/x) = 0
then 1/x = {\pi, 2\pi, 3\pi, ... } = n \pi
So I get: x = \frac{1}{(n)\pi}
Different than your solution, but the same idea: as n gets larger, x gets closer to 0, but ... between every point where sin(1/x) = 0, it oscillates up to +1 (or down to -1):

when sin(1/x) = 1 --> 1/x = {\pi/2, 2\pi+\pi/2, ...} = 2n\pi+\pi/2 --> x = \frac{1}{(2n\pi + \pi/2)}
and when sin(1/x) = -1 --> 1/x = {3\pi/2, 2\pi+3\pi/2, ...} = 2n\pi+3\pi/2 --> x = \frac{1}{(2n\pi + 3\pi/2)}

So ... as x ->0, it passes through a full oscillation between each successive x_n = \frac{1}{(2n)\pi}, taking on values 0, 1, 0, -1, 0 successively between xn and xn+1

That's a long-winded answer. Does it help?

Regards, BobM
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top