Why does the Earth have a tilt but the moon doesn't?

  • Thread starter Thread starter somebodyelse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Moon Tilt
AI Thread Summary
The Earth has a significant axial tilt, likely resulting from a historical impact, which is responsible for the changing seasons. In contrast, the Moon is tidally locked to Earth, making the concept of tilt less applicable. However, the Moon does possess a slight tilt of approximately 6.6 degrees to its orbital plane and about 1.5 degrees to the ecliptic, which can create minor seasonal variations. The discussion highlights the improbability of the Moon having no tilt at all. Overall, while the Moon's tilt is minimal, it does exist and contributes to slight seasonal changes.
somebodyelse
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Are there any explanations, theoretical or otherwise, as to why the Earth has a tilt (causing the seasons) while the moon does not?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Eart's tilt is probably due to an impact. The moon is tidal locked to Earth, so I don't think the concept of "tilt" even applies to it.
 
The moon does have a tilt of ~6.6 degrees to its orbital plane around the Earth, and ~1.5 degrees to the ecliptic. That 1.5 degree tilt produces slight "seasons" on the Moon.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager
Thank you. It seemed rather against the odds that the moon would have 0 tilt at all.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top