Why Does the Expectation Value of Momentum Vanish in a Quantum Bound State?

  • Thread starter Thread starter einai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
In quantum mechanics, the expectation value of momentum in a bound state vanishes, which can be shown using the Hamiltonian H = (p^2)/(2m) + V(x). The momentum operator, being a vector, can be expressed in terms of its components, allowing the expansion of the expectation value. In a bound state, the energy eigenvalue E is fixed, enabling simplifications in calculations. The commutation relations among the momentum components indicate that their contributions to the expectation value do not lead to a net momentum. Thus, <E|p|E> = 0 is confirmed for bound states.
einai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi, I came across a problem which seems to be pretty simple, but I'm stuck :confused: .

Given a Hamiltonian:
H=\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}+V(\vec{x})

If |E> is a bound state of the Hamiltonian with energy eigenvalue E, show that: &lt;E| \vec{p} |E&gt;=0

-----------------------------------
So I've been trying something like this:

\frac{1}{2m}&lt;E|\vec{p} \cdot \vec{p}|E&gt; + &lt;E|V(\vec{x})|E&gt; = E&lt;E|E&gt; = E

but I have no idea how to proceed from here. I don't think I'm on the right track actually.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FYI: This question has been answered in the quantum physics forum.
 


Hi there! It looks like you're on the right track, but there are a few things you can do to simplify your approach. First, remember that the momentum operator \vec{p} is a vector, so it can be written as \vec{p}=\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z. This means that the dot product \vec{p}\cdot\vec{p} can be expanded as:

\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p} = (\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z)\cdot(\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z) = \vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2

Since we're interested in the expectation value of \vec{p}, we can write this as:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = <E|\vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2|E>

Now, remember that in a bound state, the energy eigenvalue E is fixed, so we can pull it out of the expectation value. This gives us:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\vec{p}_x^2 + \vec{p}_y^2 + \vec{p}_z^2|E>

Using the definition of the momentum operator, we can write \vec{p}_i^2 = \frac{\vec{p}_i\cdot\vec{p}_i}{2m} for each component i=x,y,z. This gives us:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\frac{\vec{p}_x\cdot\vec{p}_x+\vec{p}_y\cdot\vec{p}_y+\vec{p}_z\cdot\vec{p}_z}{2m}|E>

Now, using the commutation relation [\vec{p}_i,\vec{p}_j]=0 for all i,j=x,y,z, we can rearrange this expression as:

<E|\vec{p}\cdot\vec{p}|E> = E<E|\frac{\vec{p}_x
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top