Why Does the Free-Field Dirac Hamiltonian Calculation Seem Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonbones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Hamiltonian
jonbones
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a simple problem I thought of and I'm get a nonsensical answer.
I'm not sure where I'm going wrong in the calculation.

Find the value of <-,p',v';+,q',r'|H|-,p,v;+,q,r>
where H is the free-field Dirac Hamiltonian

H = \int(d3k/(2\pi)3)\sums(\widehat{c}+s(k)\widehat{c}s(k)+(\widehat{d}+s(k)\widehat{d}s(k))

Homework Equations



<p|q> = 2Ep(2\pi)3\delta(3)(p-q)

|+,q,r> = (2Eq)1/2\widehat{d}+r(q)|0>

|-,p,v> = (2Ep)1/2\widehat{c}+v(p)|0>

The Attempt at a Solution



<-,p',v';+,q',r'|H|-,p,v;+,q,r> = <-,p',v';+,q',r'|Hc|-,p,v;+q,r>+<-,p',v';+q',r'|Hd|-,p,v;+,q,r>

<-,p',v';+q',r'|Hc|-,p,v;+,q,r> = \int(d3k/{(2\pi)3)\sums<-,p',v';+,q',r'|\widehat{c}+s(k)\widehat{c}s(k)|-,p,v;+q,r>
= \int(d3k/{(2\pi)3)\sums<-,p',v'|\widehat{c}+s(k)\widehat{c}s(k)|-,p,v><+,q',r'|+q,r>
= 1/(2\pi)3(2Ev)-1<-,p',v'|-,p,v><+q',r'|+q,r>
= (2\pi)32Eq\delta(3)(v-v')\delta(3)(q-q')

Similarly, <-,p',v';+q',r'|Hd|-,p,v;+,q,r> = (2\pi)32Ev\delta(3)(v-v')\delta(3)(q-q')

I know these are wrong since <-,p',v';+q',r'|Hc|-,p,v;+,q,r> \proptoEp and <-,p',v';+q',r'|Hd|-,p,v;+,q,r> \proptoEq.

I'm pretty sure I'm calculating the operator pieces like <-,p',v';+,q',r'|\widehat{c}+s(k)\widehat{c}s(k)|-,p,v;+q,r> incorrectly but I'm not sure where I'm going wrong.

-- Jonathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I found a solution to a similar problem and now I know what I did wrong.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top