Why does the half of the absolute value of a matrix formed with its coordinates give

BlueRope
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Why does the half of the absolute value of a matrix formed with its coordinates give the area of a triangle?


I don't see any similarity between that and the heron's formula.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You mean determinant.
 


Yeah, why is that?
 


The reason is because half the area of a parallelogram is the area of a triangle. Say you have k linearly independent vectors, the volume of the parallelepiped they span is given by the formula:V(x_1,...,x_k)= \sqrt{det(X^{tr}X)}. This formula is easiest to understand in 3 dimensions. Say you have two vectors a and b which are elements of \mathbb{R}^3 then the volume formula says that V(a,b)^2=det\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \|a\|^2 &amp; \langle a,b \rangle \\<br /> \langle b,a \rangle &amp; \|b\|^2 \\<br /> \end{bmatrix} = \|a\|^2\|b\|^2-\langle a,b \rangle^2 = \|a\|^2\|b\|^2(1-\cos^2(\theta)) = \|a\|^2\|b\|^2\sin^2(\theta) which is just the area of the parallelogram spanned by a and b. This is the well known formula that magnitude of the cross product of the two vectors is the area of the parallelogram spanned by the two vectors.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top