Why Does the Mirror Charge Method Double the Potential Energy?

Aroldo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
The situation is the classic one: a point charge q+ in a distance d above a conductor plane grounded:
The conductor is grounded so V = 0, for z = 0.
Also, far away from the system (x2 + y2 + z2 >> d) V --> 0

The argument to replace it for a q- charge seems perfect to me.
What I can't understand why W (potential energy) of the two point charges is twice as much as the conductor plane + q+ charge system.
I mean, why E = 0 for z < 0 in the conductor plane + q+.
Thank you a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Gauss law on the "underside" of the conductor: no charge, no field.
 
  • Like
Likes Aroldo
What do you mean by 'underside', the region immediately bellow the conductor, or a phill box that starts inside the conductor and ends in z < 0?
 
Both give E = 0.

The mirror charge method only says something about the region where the real charge is (because a solution to the field equation is unique, anything is allowed, but the solution is only for that region).
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top