Why does the operator S_p - S_n in deuteron result in a zero expectation value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silversonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deuteron Zero
Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi, apologies if this is simple. I'm a bit confused with a piece of text from Introductory Nuclear Physics by Wong. It's talking about finding the expectation value of the magnetic moment of the deuteron. In the deuteron it is known the total spin quantum number is S = 1. In deriving the total \mu we have a term

< S_p - S_n> (note: this is meant to be operators).

Quoting from the text: "Since the operator S_p - S_n acts on proton and neutron spins with opposite signs, it can only connect between two states, one with S = 1, and the other with S = 0, and as a result, cannot contribute to the expectation value of interest to us here".

I'm at a bit of a loss as to what it's saying here, I know

< S_p - S_n> = \int \phi^*S_p\phi dV - \int \phi^*S_n \phi dV

where \phi is the total deuteron wavefunction. Since the deuteron is in an S = 1 state the proton and neutron either have the same spin z-component or opposite. Since really when we talk about the magnetic moment we're talking about the z-component, any state where the z-component is the same for the proton and neutron cancel out in this S_p - S_n expectation value...but what about if the spins are opposite? I don't really comprehend what the text is saying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silversonic said:
Since the deuteron is in an S = 1 state the proton and neutron either have the same spin z-component or opposite.
No, that's incorrect. The S = 1 states are the three states that are symmetric:
The state with Sz = +1 is |↑↑>,
The state with Sz = -1 is |↓↓>,
And the state with Sz = 0 is (|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2
The remaining state, the antisymmetric state, (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2, has S = 0 and Sz = 0

Silversonic said:
"Since the operator S_p - S_n acts on proton and neutron spins with opposite signs, it can only connect between two states, one with S = 1, and the other with S = 0, and as a result, cannot contribute to the expectation value of interest to us here".
Note that
(Sp - Sn)|↑↑> = 0,
Sp - Sn)|↓↓> = 0,
and (Sp - Sn)(|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2 = (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2.
So acting on the S = 1 states it either gives you zero, or else it gives you the S = 0 state.
 
Thanks for the reply.

Bill_K said:
No, that's incorrect. The S = 1 states are the three states that are symmetric:
The state with Sz = +1 is |↑↑>,
The state with Sz = -1 is |↓↓>,
And the state with Sz = 0 is (|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2
The remaining state, the antisymmetric state, (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2, has S = 0 and Sz = 0

Was I incorrect because I should've said the proton and neutron have the same z-spin or are in a superposition of states with opposite z-spins?

Bill_K said:
Note that
(Sp - Sn)|↑↑> = 0,
Sp - Sn)|↓↓> = 0,
and (Sp - Sn)(|↑↓> + |↓↑>)/√2 = (|↑↓> - |↓↑>)/√2.
So acting on the S = 1 states it either gives you zero, or else it gives you the S = 0 state.

But then how does obtaining the S = 0 state create a zero expectation value? If calculating the expectation value then:

\int \phi^*\chi_{S=1}^*<S_p-S_n>\phi\chi_{S=1} dV = \int \phi^*\phi\chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0} dV = \chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0}

assuming the space parts are normalised. Is this final product supposed to be zero?
 
Silversonic said:
But then how does obtaining the S = 0 state create a zero expectation value? If calculating the expectation value then:

\int \phi^*\chi_{S=1}^*<S_p-S_n>\phi\chi_{S=1} dV = \int \phi^*\phi\chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0} dV = \chi_{S=1}^*\chi_{S=0}

assuming the space parts are normalised. Is this final product supposed to be zero?
Spin states with different values of S are orthogonal. The S = 0 state is orthogonal to the S = 1 states, so the inner product is zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top