Why does the speed of the water wave decreases as depth decreases?

AI Thread Summary
The speed of water waves decreases as they approach shallower regions primarily due to energy loss from friction between the water and the seabed, which affects wave height. As waves transition from deep to shallow water, their motion changes from orbital to elliptical, contributing to a reduction in speed. The phenomenon of wave shoaling, where waves increase in amplitude and decrease in wavelength as they approach the shore, also plays a significant role in this process. Additionally, opposing currents can influence wave heights and behavior, further complicating the dynamics of wave speed. Overall, while friction is a factor, it is not the sole reason for the decrease in wave speed in shallow water.
tlfx1996
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Why does the speed of the water wave decreases when the water wave approaches the shallower region? Is it because of the frictional force between the water molecules and the seabed? I have searched the net but i didn't get any clear answer to this questions. Please explain in details of the phenomenon without solely based on the formula, thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The friction between the water and the sea bed robs the wave of energy so that it cannot raise up as high.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
but I still couldn't get a clue how does the change from the orbital movement to the elliptical movement will causes the speed to slow down.
 
That's a complex phenomena..as is evidenced by continued failures to prevent erosion...

but there are some good insights here:

http://web.utk.edu/~cnattras/Physics221Spring2013/modules/m11/Water_waves.htm

More here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_waves#Wave_shoaling_and_refraction

I find this second article strange in that they neglect to mention the effects of opposing currents in the very first section but do properly attribute effects of currents in 'shoaling'. I can tell you from long personal experience that opposing current in shoal AND deep water significantly effects wave heights. In fact, current alone usually causes waves to form.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Viscosity (essentially friction) would certainly play a part. The other issue that immediately comes to mind is that as waves come to shore and grow, they become nonlinear and end up Rollin over and creatin whitecaps. These will dissipate a fair amount of energy.
 
I don't know much about waves, but looking at this GIF from Wikipedia:

220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif


Might it have to do with the fact the wave has to keep the same frequency? I don't know if that's true under certain circumstances. If so, then looking at the GIF it kind of makes sense that the amplitude would rise due to the shallow water. The rise in amplitude would shorten the wavelength, and in order to keep the same frequency, the speed has to slow down.

Don't know if any of what I wrote is true or makes sense...

Edit: Following the Wikipedia article, I reached another article on "wave shoaling". I just skimmed over it, but it seems that the answer would lie somewhere in that term.

I suspect friction is not the prime driver for the reduction in speed...
 

Attachments

  • 220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    11.9 KB · Views: 680
  • 220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    220px-Propagation_du_tsunami_en_profondeur_variable.gif
    11.9 KB · Views: 686
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top