I Why does the square of the amplitude of a wave function represent P?

Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It’s simply a postulate of quantum mechanics, you can motivate it based on various arguments but it cannot really be derived from anything in a non-circular manner.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
Haynes Kwon said:
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
It can be derived to a certain degree, but the most general such derivations are quite advanced. If you're still learning QM it is best to accept it as a postulate.

A derivation of it is basically if you acknowledge nature can have discrete outcomes in certain experiments with those outcomes having a certain algebraic relation to each other you can derive that all probabilities must come from a specific operator ##\rho## with the wavefunction being a sort of special case (pure state). See the thread @Mentz114 mentioned as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top