Why Does the Taylor Series of exp(-x^2) at x = 0 Start with 1 - x^2?

cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3
The Taylor Series of f(x) = exp(-x^2) at x = 0 is 1-x^2...

Why is this?

The formula for Taylor Series is f(x) = f(0) + (x/1!)(f'(0)) + (x^2/2!)(f''(0)) + ...

and f'(x) = -2x(exp(-x^2)) therefore f'(0) = 0?

Can someone please explain why it is 1-x^2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Although f'(0) = 0, yet f''(0) will NOT be zero.
 
The formula is (x^n)/n! (with the sigma crap in front)
0! is 1 and x^0 is 1

Just substitute x=-t^2 and you get the series for e^-t^2
 
HomogenousCow said:
The formula is (x^n)/n! (with the sigma crap in front)
0! is 1 and x^0 is 1

Just substitute x=-t^2 and you get the series for e^-t^2

Then why doesn't the second derivative term have an x^4?
 
Here's what HomogenousCow is trying to say. Consider the expansion of ##\exp(t)## where ##t=-x^2##. The Taylor expansion of ##\exp(t)## is $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{t^n}{n!},$$ so substituting gives you $$e^{-x^2}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-x^2)^n}{n!}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n x^{2n}}{n!}.$$

The second derivative term does not have an ##x^4## by its definition: Each term is given by ##\frac{f^{(n)}(0)x^n}{n!}## (for MacLaurin; for Taylor about ##c##, it's ##\frac{f^{(n)}(c)(x-c)^n}{n!}##). When you plug in 2, you get $$\frac{f''(0)x^2}{2!}.$$ In this case, ##f''(0)=-2##. This cancels with the ##2!## in the denominator, so you end up with ##1-x^2## as the first two nontrivial terms of the expansion.
 
Last edited:
cytochrome said:
Then why doesn't the second derivative term have an x^4?
It looks like you are trying to combine two different ways of finding the Taylor series of e^{-x^2}

1) Using the basic definition: the "x^2" term has coefficient f''(0)/2 so that the second derivative term, by definition, involves x^2, not x^4.

2) Replacing x in the Taylor's series for e^x with -x^2. In that case, the term that you get from the second derivative of e^x has x^4 but that has nothing to do with the second derivative of e^{-x^2}. That term comes from replacing x with -x^2 in the f'(0) x term of the Taylor series for e^x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top