Why Does Weight Depend on Location?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between weight, pressure, and measurement units, particularly in the context of vacuum height of mercury. It highlights the importance of using consistent units for pressure, emphasizing that kg/cm² is not a standard pressure unit and should be clarified as kg wt/cm². The conversation also touches on the ambiguity of weight versus mass in different measurement systems, noting that pounds can refer to either mass or force, while kilograms are strictly mass. Additionally, it explains that weight varies by location due to gravitational differences, with a recommendation that weight should be expressed in Newtons for accuracy. Overall, the thread underscores the necessity of clear definitions and unit conversions in scientific discussions.
chito1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Vacuum height of mercury
Relevant Equations
Is the pressure in kg / cm2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36cmHg?
Is the pressure in kg / cm2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36inHg?
Is the pressure in kg / lb/ni2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36cmHg?
Is the pressure in kg / lb/ni2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36inHg?
Vacuum height of mercury
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whaatt?

What's an ni2abs? Can you please define your units, and show the unit conversions that are probably involved? Thanks.
 
chito1 said:
Homework Statement:: Vacuum height of mercury
Relevant Equations:: Is the pressure in kg / cm2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36cmHg?
Is the pressure in kg / cm2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36inHg?
Is the pressure in kg / lb/ni2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36cmHg?
Is the pressure in kg / lb/ni2abs when the vacuum height of mercury is 36inHg?

Vacuum height of mercury
I assume ni2abs should be in2absolute.
kg / cm2 is not a pressure. You probably mean kg wt/ cm2. Metric units don't play fast and loose with masses and weights like the American system does.

Regardless of the units used for the height of the mercury, you can use whatever units you like for the pressure. It's just a matter of making the necessary conversions.

If you are asking what units you would use for pressure in order to avoid or minimise conversions, the answer depends on the units you have for the density of mercury. E.g. if that is given as 13.56 grams per cubic centimeter, then a height of y cm of mercury will exert a pressure 13.56y grams wt per sq cm, or 0.01356y kg wt/cm2.

If you have a specific case in mind, please post it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
haruspex said:
Metric units don't play fast and loose with masses and weights like the American system does.
Then how come the metrics world quotes weight in kilos whereas the yankee system correctly uses pounds? :))
And no, no one says "I weigh 80 Newtons"!
 
rude man said:
Then how come the metrics world quotes weight in kilos whereas the yankee system correctly uses pounds? :))
And no, no one says "I weigh 80 Newtons"!
The "yankee system" is ambiguous about whether pounds means mass or force.

Legally, medically, for purposes of commerce and for purposes of how fat you are when you stand on a scale, pounds are units of mass. Most of the time when we yankees think about the pound, we think of it as a unit of force. One cannot be correct about how a unit is used if one is ambiguous about how that unit is used.

When we say that we "weigh 80 kilograms" that is entirely proper and is a claim about our mass. Even though your physics teacher will ding you for using the word "weight" to denote a mass. Your physics teacher is paid to teach you a jargon usage of the term. That does not preclude the correctness of other meanings.
 
jbriggs444 said:
When we say that we "weigh 80 kilograms" that is entirely proper and is a claim about our mass. Even though your physics teacher will ding you for using the word "weight" to denote a mass.
Weight depends on where you are.
If your "weight" is 80kg on Earth it is much less on the Moon. So on the moon your scales give you your incorrect mass. Your scales give you your mass on Earth only. Your "weight" should be denominated in Newtons, not kg.
 
rude man said:
Weight depends on where you are.
If your "weight" is 80kg on Earth it is much less on the Moon. So on the moon your scales give you your incorrect mass. Your scales give you your mass on Earth only. Your "weight" should be denominated in Newtons, not kg.
The "net weight" on a 16 ounce can of peas is 16 ounces regardless. At the equator. At the poles. In Death Valley. On Mount Everest, on the moon and in orbit. That "net weight" is a mass measurement. By law. Exactly as we would want. We would not want to buy and sell goods using a measurement that depends on location.

A Toledo scale will give you the same answer for all of those except, possibly, in orbit. "Honest weight, no springs".

A spring scale will also give you the same answer, provided it is valid for commercial use. Such a scale will have been properly calibrated to deliver correct mass measurements in the location where it is used.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top